Thumbnail Image
Item

Deafness in Australia: Where to Go from Here

Kleiner, Jack
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Research project
Date
2022
Advisor
Hall, Matthew L.
Committee member
Group
Temple University. Honors Program
Department
Subject
Hearing impaired
 Deaf
 Deaf Australia
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/7508
Collections
Livingstone Undergraduate Research Awards
Show all metadata
Files
Thumbnail Image
Kleiner-ResearchProject-2022.pdf
Adobe PDF, 245.76 KB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/7486
Abstract
In 1982, the company Cochlear Ltd. was founded and based in Australia, and in collaboration with the Australian government, "sought to bring the cochlear implant to market” (Blume, 2010; Cochlear Ltd.). Today, 80% of Australia Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children are implanted with a cochlear implant (Hyde, 2005). Cochlear claims that they “empower people to connect with others and live a full life.” But what is stopping a DHH person from living a full life? Many people in the Australian Deaf community would argue that being Deaf is not a loss, and that being connected to one’s Deaf identity and a sign language is empowering and meaningful, and certainly a part of a “full life” regardless of if cochlear implant is involved (Levitzke-Gray, 2016). The role of the cochlear implant is established in its founding but is nevertheless symbolic of a broader issue. The othering of DHH people is not unique to Australia, but certainly a key reason why DHH people struggle there. The reliance on cochlear implants can delay language acquisition, as the subsequent reliance on spoken language, as opposed to a sign language like Australian Sign Language (Auslan), affects a person’s ability to navigate the world (Levitzke-Gray, 2016; Madden, 2008; Winn, 2007). This missed opportunity for acquiring language more easily for DHH people – which would open the gates earlier for things such as socialization, connection to Deaf culture, access to health care, etc. – affects a Deaf Australian’s right to a healthy life. Organizations such as Deaf Australia and activists like Drisana Levitzke-Gray advocate for doctors and the people of Australia to recognize sign languages like Auslan as a full and useful language, and for acceptance of Deaf people and their culture, and to not rush to “fix” a DHH child with a cochlear implant, which often do not work as intended or make the child “hearing” (Madden, 2008). The Australian government, too, is being asked to step up and ensure rights to people with disabilities as they promised by signing the UN’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This paper will explore these two options to help the DHH people of Australia, and recommend which direction is best.
Description
This research project was completed as part of the Honors The World of Sign Language and the Sign Languages of the World course.
Citation
Citation to related work
Livingstone Undergraduate Research Awards website: https://sites.temple.edu/livingstone/2022-livingstone-undergraduate-research-award-in-general-education/
Has part
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
Embedded videos