• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of TUScholarShareCommunitiesDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenresThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenres

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutPeoplePoliciesHelp for DepositorsData DepositFAQs

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    THE FDA’S 510(k) APPROVAL PROCESS AND THE SAFETY OF MEDICAL DEVICES

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Collins_temple_0225E_15306.pdf
    Size:
    3.340Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Genre
    Thesis/Dissertation
    Date
    2023
    Author
    Collins, Anne Whitney
    Advisor
    Mudambi, Susan M.
    Committee member
    Andersson, Lynne M.
    Hill, TL
    Viswanathan, Krupa S.
    Department
    Business Administration/Accounting
    Subject
    Business administration
    Health care management
    Innovation
    Medical device industry
    Patient safety
    Regulation
    US Food & Drug Administration
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/8614
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/8578
    Abstract
    Innovation fuels American business. Commonly, innovation is judged as good. Yet, many of the new medical devices that come on the U.S. market every year are later deemed unsafe. Regulation is distorted in that 98% of medical devices are never evaluated in human trials before being introduced to the marketplace. Instead, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves a new medical device through a designated 501(k) process, based upon the identification of a predicate or substantially equivalent (SE) device. This is an investigation of the tension between product innovation, government regulation, and public safety in the American healthcare industry. It is a research project in two parts. The first draws upon established methodologies and utilizes the FDA’s 501(k) database to provide an illustrated example of the sequence and dependency between generations of implanted surgical mesh devices. The analysis reveals that the 501(k) approval process reliance on predicate devices facilitates medical device innovation that is problematic in several aspects, including patient safety. To further examine medical device innovation and patient safety, the second study develops a proof-of-concept exercise to evaluate data on recorded adverse events (AEs) found in the FDA’s Total Product Lifecyle (TPLC) database for surgical mesh products. The adverse events were mapped to the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine’s (AAAM’s) Abbreviate Injury Scale (AIS), following precedents found in the medico-legal literature and military injury biomechanics standards. This approach forges a path forward to determine the relative frequency and severity of adverse events of a specific medical device, compared to that of the overall FDA product category. These two research projects combine to contribute to the understanding of safety of the FDA’s approval process and by extension the medical device industry’s innovation practices.
    ADA compliance
    For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
    Collections
    Theses and Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Temple University Libraries | 1900 N. 13th Street | Philadelphia, PA 19122
    (215) 204-8212 | scholarshare@temple.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.