Other-Emptiness in the Jonang School: The Theo-logic of Buddhist Dualism
Genre
Journal articleDate
2015Author
Duckworth, Douglas S.Department
ReligionPermanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/6603
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
http://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2015.0045Abstract
This paper aims to clarify the meaning of other-emptiness in the Jonang (jo nang) tradition of Buddhism of Tibet. The focus is on the writings of Dölpopa (dol po pa shes rab rgyal mtshan, 1292–1361), the renowned forefather of this tradition. Dölpopa famously differentiated two types of emptiness, or two ways of being empty—self-emptiness (rang stong) and other-emptiness (gzhan stong)—and proclaimed the superiority of the latter. Dölpopa maintains that other-emptiness is better because it represents what really exists while self-emptiness does not, and that it also offers a more effective means to access the real. While Dölpopa is famous for asserting the real existence of a nondual ultimate reality, it is argued here that his depiction of other-emptiness represents a fairly clear-cut account of dualism.Citation
Duckworth, Douglas S. “Other-Emptiness in the Jonang: The Theo-logic of Buddhist Dualism.” Philosophy East & West 65, no. 2 (2015): 485-97.Citation to related work
University of Hawaii PressHas part
Philosophy East and West, Vol. 65, No. 2, April 2015ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6585