Snake-oil, quack medicine, and industrially cultured organisms: Biovalue and the commercialization of human microbiome research
Genre
Journal ArticleDate
2012-10-31Author
Slashinski, MJMcCurdy, SA
Achenbaum, LS
Whitney, SN
McGuire, AL
Subject
AwarenessCommerce
Dietary Supplements
Drug Industry
Ethics, Research
Humans
Metagenome
Probiotics
Public Health
Public Opinion
Quackery
Research
Technology Transfer
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/5444
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
10.1186/1472-6939-13-28Abstract
Background: Continued advances in human microbiome research and technologies raise a number of ethical, legal, and social challenges. These challenges are associated not only with the conduct of the research, but also with broader implications, such as the production and distribution of commercial products promising maintenance or restoration of good physical health and disease prevention. In this article, we document several ethical, legal, and social challenges associated with the commercialization of human microbiome research, focusing particularly on how this research is mobilized within economic markets for new public health uses. Methods. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews (2009-2010) with 63 scientists, researchers, and National Institutes of Health project leaders (investigators) involved with human microbiome research. Interviews explored a range of ethical, legal, and social dimensions of human microbiome research, including investigators perspectives on commercialization. Using thematic content analysis, we identified and analyzed emergent themes and patterns. Results: Investigators discussed the commercialization of human microbiome research in terms of (1) commercialization, probiotics, and issues of safety, (2) public awareness of the benefits and risks of dietary supplements, and (3) regulation. Conclusion: The prevailing theme of ethical, legal, social concern focused on the need to find a balance between the marketplace, scientific research, and the publics health. The themes we identified are intended to serve as points for discussions about the relationship between scientific research and the manufacture and distribution of over-the-counter dietary supplements in the United States. © 2012 Slashinski et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.Citation to related work
Springer Science and Business Media LLCHas part
BMC Medical EthicsADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/5426