Loading...
Cross-Examination: Seemingly Ubiquitous, Purportedly Omnipotent, and “At Risk”
Epstein, Jules
Epstein, Jules
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Journal article
Date
2009
Advisor
Committee member
Group
Department
Subject
Permanent link to this record
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6728
Abstract
Cross-examination is viewed as a core aspect of the trial process, both criminal and civil, and its use and purported power are omnipresent in the American adjudicative system. Indeed, this role is confirmed in the abundance of literature (both fictional and educational) involving cross-examination, and its increasing prominence in the law school curriculum. This article confirms the exalted status cross-examination has achieved and arguably retains in the American trial and fact-finding process, while simultaneously identifying its frailties: its ineffectiveness as a truth-discerning tool in varying contexts; trends in constitutional law that will eliminate the requirement of cross-examination for expanding categories of witnesses; and the impact of technology and popular media on the learning processes and expectations of jurors. Particularly because of the transformation of hearsay law and the continuing trend toward visual rather than aural learning and knowledge accumulation, cross-examination may play a reduced role in the trial process and its form may need to be reinvented.
Description
Citation
Jules Epstein, Cross-Examination: Seemingly Ubiquitous, Purportedly Omnipotent, and "At Risk", 14 WIDENER L. REV. 427 (2009).
Citation to related work
Widener University School of Law
Has part
Widener Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 2
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu