Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Item

When Sources Contradict: The Epistemological Functions of Contradiction in News Texts

Coddington, Mark
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Post-print
Date
2023-05-17
Advisor
Committee member
Group
Department
Journalism
Permanent link to this record
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2212384
Abstract
Contradiction is a defining characteristic of contemporary journalism, despite the risks it carries of raising uncertainty among audiences. Scholars and observers alike have called for journalists to embrace an epistemological stance rooted in adjudication of competing claims, but studies suggest journalists can only rarely perform this service. What, then, is the epistemological role of contradictions in journalism? This study employs quantitative and qualitative analysis of news texts over a 12-year span to explore tensions in journalistic norms that shape the presentation of contradictions. Findings suggest contradictions are infrequently presented in news texts and are usually between sources on equal footing. In the rare cases journalists themselves contradict their sources, these contradictions are neither explicit nor forceful. Many contradictions revolve around questions of interpretation.
Description
Citation
Coddington, M., & Molyneux, L. (2023). When Sources Contradict: The Epistemological Functions of Contradiction in News Texts. Journalism Studies, 24(10), 1316–1333. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2212384
Citation to related work
Taylor and Francis Group
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journalism Studies on 2023-07-27, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2212384.
Has part
Journalism Studies
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
Embedded videos