Show simple item record

dc.creatorTao, Kaiming
dc.creatorTzou, Philip L.
dc.creatorPond, Sergei
dc.creatorIoannidis, John P. A.
dc.creatorShafer, Robert W.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T19:20:28Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T19:20:28Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-14
dc.identifier.issn2165-0497
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/9732
dc.description.abstractSARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants contain many mutations in its spike receptor-binding domain, the target of all authorized monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Determining the extent to which Omicron variants reduced MAb susceptibility is critical to preventing and treating COVID-19. We systematically reviewed PubMed and three preprint servers, last updated 11 April 2022, for the in vitro activity of authorized MAbs against the Omicron variants. Fifty-one studies were eligible, including 50 containing Omicron BA.1 susceptibility data and 17 containing Omicron BA.2 susceptibility data. The first two authorized MAb combinations, bamlanivimab/etesevimab and casirivimab/imdevimab, were largely inactive against the Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants. In 34 studies, sotrovimab displayed a median 4.0-fold (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.6 to 6.9) reduction in activity against Omicron BA.1, and in 12 studies, it displayed a median 17-fold (IQR: 13 to 30) reduction in activity against Omicron BA.2. In 15 studies, the combination cilgavimab/tixagevimab displayed a median 86-fold (IQR: 27 to 151) reduction in activity against Omicron BA.1, and in six studies, it displayed a median 5.4-fold (IQR: 3.7 to 6.9) reduction in activity against Omicron BA.2. In eight studies against Omicron BA.1 and six studies against Omicron BA.2, bebtelovimab displayed no reduction in activity. Disparate results between assays were common. For authorized MAbs, 51/268 (19.0%) results for wild-type control variants and 78/348 (22.4%) results for Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants were more than 4-fold below or 4-fold above the median result for that MAb. Highly disparate results between published assays indicate a need for improved MAb susceptibility test standardization or interassay calibration. IMPORTANCE: Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are among the most effective measures for preventing and treating COVID-19. However, SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants contain many mutations in their spike receptor-binding domains, the target of all authorized MAbs. Therefore, determining the extent to which Omicron variants reduced MAb susceptibility is critical to preventing and treating COVID-19. We identified 51 studies that reported the in vitro susceptibility of the two main Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.2 to therapeutic MAbs in advanced clinical development, including eight authorized individual MAbs and three authorized MAb combinations. We estimated the degree to which different MAbs displayed reduced activity against Omicron variants. The marked loss of activity of many MAbs against Omicron variants underscores the importance of developing MAbs that target conserved regions of spike. Highly disparate results between assays indicate the need for improved MAb susceptibility test standardization.
dc.format.extent17 pages
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofFaculty/ Researcher Works
dc.relation.haspartMicrobiology Spectrum, Vol. 10, Iss. 4
dc.relation.isreferencedbyAmerican Society for Microbiology
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2
dc.subjectOmicron variant
dc.subjectMonoclonal antibody
dc.subjectNeutralization
dc.subjectSpikeprotein
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectAntiviral therapy
dc.subjectMultidrug resistance
dc.titleSusceptibility of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants to Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
dc.typeText
dc.type.genreJournal article
dc.contributor.groupInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine (iGEM) (Temple University)
dc.description.departmentBiology
dc.relation.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00926-22
dc.ada.noteFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
dc.description.schoolcollegeTemple University. College of Science and Technology
dc.creator.orcidPond|0000-0003-4817-4029
dc.temple.creatorPond, Sergei L. Kosakovsky
refterms.dateFOA2024-03-11T19:20:28Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
PondEtAl-JournalArticle-2022-06.pdf
Size:
2.138Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY