• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of TUScholarShareCommunitiesDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenresThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenres

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutPeoplePoliciesHelp for DepositorsData DepositFAQs

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A CLOSER LOOK AT COMMONALITY AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SECTION SCORES ON THE SALZMANN EVALUATION INDEX AMONG MEDICAID PATIENTS SEEKING ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT IN PENNSYLVANIA

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Henderson_temple_0225M_15358.pdf
    Size:
    957.5Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Genre
    Thesis/Dissertation
    Date
    2023-08
    Author
    Henderson, James Joseph
    Advisor
    Godel, Jeffrey H.
    Committee member
    Sciote, James J.
    Doumit, Carmen
    Moore, John V., III
    Department
    Oral Biology
    Subject
    Dentistry
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/8914
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/8878
    Abstract
    Objectives: The Salzmann Evaluation Index (SEI) is the malocclusion index used by Medicaid insurance administrators in Pennsylvania. An SEI of 25 is regarded as the threshold for approval. The SEI is broken into three subsections: intra-arch deviations (IAD; discrepancies within an arch), anterior Inter-arch deviations (AIAD; incisor antagonist relationships) and posterior inter-arch deviations (PIAD; posterior antagonist). This study identified discrepancies amongst the overall SEI score and subsection scores, in approved or denied cases with a SEI>25. Differences in subsection scores may identify malocclusion characteristics, other than overall scores, which drive insurance approval. Methods: The study sample included 570 subjects (295 approved and 275 denied). All subjects had a SEI>25. These scores along with a cephalogram, panorex, and intra/extra oral photographs, were previously sent to the administrator and a funding decision was rendered. SEI and subsection scores were compared between approved or denied treatment funding by T-Tests. Results: There was a significant difference in the overall SEI score between approved and denied records (p<0.001), with higher scores more likely to obtain approval. No difference was found for the IAD (p=0.195). Significant difference between approved and denied scores were found for both AIAD and PIAD (p<0.001). Effective subsection weight of contribution to the overall SEI was: IAD=55.38%, AIAD=24.86%, and PIAD=19.76%. Conclusions: Only 51.75% of subjects that had an SEI> 25 were awarded treatment funding. Although IAD contributes over half the total SEI, differences in this portion did not effectively influence insurance administrator decisions. There may be an inherent approval bias favoring malocclusions with crossbite, open bite, overbite, overjet, and sagittal tooth positions, rather than tooth-in-arch positions or overall SEI score.
    ADA compliance
    For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
    Collections
    Theses and Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Temple University Libraries | 1900 N. 13th Street | Philadelphia, PA 19122
    (215) 204-8212 | scholarshare@temple.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.