Measuring the Neutron Spin Asymmetry A1n in the Valence Quark Region in Hall C at Jefferson Lab
Genre
Thesis/DissertationDate
2023Author
Cardona, Melanie LeighAdvisor
Sparveris, NikolaosCommittee member
Meziani, ZeinEddineMetz, Andreas
Sawatzky, Brad
Department
PhysicsSubject
PhysicsParticle physics
Nuclear physics and radiation
Hadronic physics
Medium energy nuclear physics
Spin asymmetry
Spin structure
Valence quarks
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/8584
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/8548Abstract
The quest to understand how the nucleon spin is decomposed into its constituent quark and gluon spin and orbital angular momentum (OAM) components has been at the forefront of nuclear physics for decades. Due to the nonperturbative nature of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)  the theory describing how quarks and gluons bind together to form protons and neutrons  making absolute predictions of nucleon spin structure is generally difficult, especially as a function of its quark and gluon longitudinal momentum fraction x. Measurements involving nucleon spin structure serve as a sensitive test for QCD, including abinitio lattice QCD calculations due to the advent of the quasiPDF formalism, and various predictions that diverge at largex. The neutron spin asymmetry A1n at highx is a key observable for probing nucleon spin structure. In the valence domain (x > 0.5), sea effects are expected to be negligible, and so the total nucleon spin is considered to be carried by the valence quarks. The valence region can therefore enable us to study the role of quark OAM and other nonperturbative effects of the strong force. A1^n was measured in the deep inelastic scattering region of 0.40 < x < 0.75 and 6 < Q^2 < 10 GeV^2 in Hall C at Jefferson Lab using a 10.4 GeV longitudinally polarized electron beam, upgraded polarized He3 target, and the High Momentum Spectrometer (HMS) and Super High Momentum Spectrometer (SHMS). E1206110 provides the first precision data in the valence quark region above x = 0.60, and its preliminary results proved consistent with earlier data disqualifying a pQCD model that excluded quark OAM. Combined with previous world proton data, the ratio of the polarizedtounpolarized up quark momentum distribution (∆u + ∆antiu)/(u + antiu) remained positive at largex, and the down quark (∆d + ∆antid)/(d + antid) remained negative.ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

In situ characterization of nanoparticles using rayleigh scatteringSantra, B; Shneider, MN; Car, R; Santra, Biswajit0000000336092106 (20170110)© The Author(s) 2017. We report a theoretical analysis showing that Rayleigh scattering could be used to monitor the growth of nanoparticles under arc discharge conditions. We compute the Rayleigh scattering cross sections of the nanoparticles by combining light scattering theory for gasparticle mixtures with calculations of the dynamic electronic polarizability of the nanoparticles. We find that the resolution of the Rayleigh scattering probe is adequate to detect nanoparticles as small as C 60 at the expected concentrations of synthesis conditions in the arc periphery. Larger asymmetric nanoparticles would yield brighter signals, making possible to follow the evolution of the growing nanoparticle population from the evolution of the scattered intensity. Observable spectral features include characteristic resonant behaviour, shapedependent depolarization ratio, and massdependent line shape. Direct observation of nanoparticles in the early stages of growth with unobtrusive laser probes should give insight on the particle formation mechanisms and may lead to bettercontrolled synthesis protocols.

Effect of twobeam coupling in strongfield optical pumpprobe experimentsWahlstrand, JK; Odhner, JH; McCole, ET; Cheng, YH; Palastro, JP; Levis, RJ; Milchberg, HM (20130502)Nonlinear optics experiments measuring phase shifts induced in a weak probe pulse by a strong pump pulse must account for coherent effects that only occur when the pump and probe pulses are temporally overlapped. It is well known that a weak probe beam experiences a greater phase shift from a strong pump beam than the pump beam induces on itself. The physical mechanism behind the enhanced phase shift is diffraction of pump light into the probe direction by a nonlinear refractive index grating produced by interference between the two beams. For an instantaneous thirdorder response, the effect of the grating is to simply double the probe phase shift, but when delayed nonlinearities are considered, the effect is more complex. A comprehensive treatment is given for both degenerate and nondegenerate pumpprobe experiments in noble and diatomic gases. Results of numerical calculations are compared to a recent transient birefringence measurement and a recent spectral interferometry experiment. We also present results from two new experiments using spectrally resolved transient birefringence with 800 nm pulses in Ar and air and degenerate chirped pulse spectral interferometry in Ar. Both experiments support the interpretation of the negative birefringence at high intensity as arising from a plasma grating. © 2013 American Physical Society.

Assessment of the scaled PerdewZunger selfinteraction correction applied to three levels of density functional approximationsPerdew, John P.; Ruzsinzsky, Adrienn; Yan, Qimin; Carnevale, Vincenzo (Temple University. Libraries, 2021)The KohnSham density functional theory (KSDFT) finds an approximate solution for the manyelectron problem for the ground state energy and density by solving the selfconsistent oneelectron Schr\"{o}dinger equations. KSDFT would be an exact theory if we could find the precise form of exchangecorrelation energy $(E_{xc})$. However, this would not be computationally feasible. The density functional approximations (DFAs) are designed to be exact in the limit of uniform densities. They require a parametrization of the correlation energy per electron $(\varepsilon_c)$ of the uniform electron gas (UEG). These DFAs take the parametrizations of correlation energy as their input since the exact analytical form of $\varepsilon_c$ is still unknown. Almost all the DFAs of higher rungs of Jacob's ladder employ an additional function on top of $\varepsilon_c$ for approximating their correlation energy. Exchange energies in these DFAs are also approximated by applying an enhancement factor to the exchange energy per electron of the UEG. Exchangecorrelation energy is the glue that holds the atoms and molecules together. The correlation energy is an important part of ``nature's glue" that binds one atom to another, and it changes significantly when the bonding of the molecule changes. It is a measure of the effect of Coulomb repulsion due to electronic mutual avoidance and is necessarily negative. We compared three parametrizations of the correlation energy per electron of the uniform electron gas to the original and the corrected density parameter interpolation (DPI), which is almost independent of QMC input, and with the recent QMC of Spink \textit{et al.}, which extends the CeperleyAlder results to fractional spin polarization and higher densities or smaller Seitz radius $r_s$. These three parametrizations are PerdewZunger or PZ 1981, VoskoWilkNusair or VWN 1980, and PerdewWang or PW 1992. The three parametrizations (especially the sophisticated PW92) are closer to the constraint satisfying DPI and are very close to the highdensity limit rather than the QMC results of Spink \textit{et al.}. These DFAs suffer from selfinteraction error (SIE) which arises due to an imperfect cancellation of selfHartree energy by selfexchangecorrelation energy of a single fully occupied orbital. The selfinteraction correction (SIC) method introduced by Perdew and Zunger (PZ) in 1981 to remove the SIE encounters a sizeextensivity problem when applied to the KohnSham (KS) orbitals. Hence, we make use of Fermi L\"owdin orbitals (FLO) for applying the PZSIC to the density functional approximations (DFAs). FLOs are the unitary transformation of the KS orbitals localized at the Fermi orbital descriptor (FOD) positions and then orthonormalized using L\"owdin's symmetric method. The PZSIC makes any approximation exact only in the region of oneelectron density and no correction if applied to the exact functional. But it spoils the slowly varying (in space) limits of the uncorrected approximate functionals, where those functionals are right by construction. Hence, scaling of PZSIC is required such that it remains intact in the region of oneelectron density and scales down in the region of manyelectron densities. The PZSIC improves the performance of DFAs for the properties that involve significant SIE, as in stretched bond situations, but overcorrects for equilibrium properties where SIE is insignificant. This overcorrection is often reduced by LSIC, local scaling of the PZSIC to the local spin density approximation (LSDA). We propose a new scaling factor to use in an LSIClike approach that satisfies an additional important constraint: the correct coefficient of Z in the asymptotic expansion of the $E_{xc}$ for atoms of atomic number Z, which is neglected by LSIC. LSIC and LSIC+ are scaled by functions of the isoorbital indicator $z_{\sigma}$ that distinguishes oneelectron regions from manyelectron regions. LSIC+ applied to LSDA works better than LSDALSIC and the Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) generalized gradient approximation (GGA) and gives comparable results to the strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) metaGGA in predicting the total energies of atoms, atomization energies, barrier heights, ionization potentials, electron affinities, and bondlength of molecules. LSDALSIC and LSDALSIC+ both fail to predict interaction energies involving weaker bonds, in sharp contrast to their earlier successes. It is found that more than one set of localized SIC orbitals can yield a nearly degenerate energetic description of the same multiple covalent bonds, suggesting that a consistent chemical interpretation of the localized orbitals requires a new way to choose their Fermi orbital descriptors. A spurious correction to the exact functional would be found unless the selfHartree and exact selfexchangecorrelation terms of the PZSIC energy density were expressed in the same gauge. Therefore, LSIC and LSIC+ are applied only to LSDA since only LSDA has the exchangecorrelation (xc) energy density in the gauge of the Hartree energy density. The transformation of energy density that achieves the Hartree gauge for the exact xc functional can be applied to approximate functionals. The use of this compliance function guarantees that scaleddown selfinteraction correction (sdSIC) will make no spurious nonzero correction to the exact functional and transforms the xc energy density into the Hartree gauge. We start from the interior scaling of PZSIC and end at exterior scaling after the gauge transformation. SCANsdSIC evaluated on SCANSIC total and localized orbital densities is applied to the highly accurate SCAN functional, which is already much better than LSDA. Hence, the predictive power of SCANsdSIC is much better, even though it is scaled by $z_\sigma$ too. It provides good results for several ground state properties discussed here, including the interaction energy of weakly bonded systems. SCANsdSIC leads to an acceptable description of many equilibrium properties, including the dissociation energies of weak bonds. However, sdSIC fails to produce the correct asymptotic behavior $\frac{1}{r}$ of xc potential. The xc potential as seen by the outermost electron will be $\frac{X_{HO}^{sd}}{r}$ where HO labels the highest occupied orbital and hence doesn't guarantee a good description of charge transfer. The optimal SIC that remains to be developed might be PZSIC evaluated on complex FermiL\"owdin orbitals (with nodeless orbital densities) and Fermi orbital descriptors chosen to minimize a measure of the inhomogeneity of the orbital densities.