Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTuohy, Brian
dc.creatorSwyryn, Meghan
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-22T20:03:16Z
dc.date.available2023-05-22T20:03:16Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/8545
dc.description.abstractOpioid overdose deaths in the United States have been steadily increasing for decades. Initially, these deaths were driven by overdoses from prescription opioids. Strict limits were placed on opioid prescriptions to decrease the supply of available opioids. Instead, this prompted a shift toward the illicit opioid market, causing an increase in heroin-related overdoses. Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid that is more potent than heroin, has become commonplace in the illicit supply of opioids. The illicit opioid market is unregulated and unpredictable, and there is no way to know exactly what is in a bag sold as heroin or “dope”. Illicit drug use has been historically dealt with as a crime rather than a public health issue in the United States. Recently, harm reduction has been offered as an alternative to this punitive approach. Harm reduction is a set of practical strategies and ideas aimed at reducing negative consequences associated with drug use. Naloxone distribution and syringe service programs are examples of currently utilized harm reduction strategies in the United States. While these programs are necessary to improve the quality of life of people who use illicit drugs, the rates of death from overdose are continuing to increase. These strategies do not protect people from the toxic and unpredictable drug supply. Safe supply is a relatively new concept, but there have been some small-scale implementations of this practice in Canada. Safe supply refers to a legal and regulated supply of drugs with mind and body-altering properties that traditionally have been accessible only through the illicit drug market. This is a necessary strategy to combat the alarming rise in overdose mortality. In this paper, I will analyze the ethics of this strategy using a principalism approach. This analysis concludes that safe supply is ethically sound, and it should be a part of our approach to the overdose epidemic. Safe supply promotes autonomy, prevents harms, advances well-being, and upholds justice for people who use drugs.
dc.format.extent31 pages
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTemple University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartofTheses and Dissertations
dc.rightsIN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectEthics
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.subjectMedical ethics
dc.subjectHarm reduction
dc.subjectInjection drug use
dc.subjectOpioids
dc.subjectOverdose
dc.subjectSafe supply
dc.titleAn Ethical Analysis of Safe Supply
dc.typeText
dc.type.genreThesis/Dissertation
dc.description.departmentUrban Bioethics
dc.relation.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/8509
dc.ada.noteFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
dc.description.degreeM.A.
dc.identifier.proqst15225
dc.date.updated2023-05-19T15:12:35Z
refterms.dateFOA2023-05-22T20:03:16Z
dc.identifier.filenameSwyryn_temple_0225M_15225.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Swyryn_temple_0225M_15225.pdf
Size:
187.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record