• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of TUScholarShareCommunitiesDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenresThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenres

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutPeoplePoliciesHelp for DepositorsData DepositFAQs

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    ESSAYS ON TEXTUAL ANALYSIS FOR INSURERS’ DISCLOSURES

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Zhang_temple_0225E_15018.pdf
    Size:
    2.033Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Genre
    Thesis/Dissertation
    Date
    2022
    Author
    Zhang, Jian
    Advisor
    Grace, Martin Francis, 1958-
    Committee member
    Collier, Benjamin
    Ellis, Cameron M.
    Naveen, Lalitha
    Department
    Business Administration/Risk Management and Insurance
    Subject
    Economics
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/8013
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/7985
    Abstract
    This thesis develops three essays examining the feasibility of textual disclosures in predicting corporate performance and how such disclosures relate to ownership structure and disclosure requirements. By using a topic modeling approach (Roberts et al., 2016a), this thesis identifies the topics discussed in the disclosures and estimates the importance of different topics. Chapter 2 examines the value of the informational content of forward-looking statements (FLS) in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section of P&C insurers’ annual regulatory filings for both publicly traded and privately owned insurers. We use a structural topic modeling approach to extract the topics discussed in the FLS and examine whether these topics can explain or predict loss reserve errors and predict a firm’s current and future performance. We have four main findings. First, the current year’s topical discussions are better predictors of future expenses, losses, surplus, and earnings than typical financial ratios such as net income and ROA. Second, both a topic’s importance (topic prevalence) and the year-to-year change in the topic’s prevalence provide information about future insurer performance. Third, the predictive power decreases as we try to predict the performance further into the future. Finally, we compare the explanatory power of topics between mutual and stock companies and find the predictive power is higher for non-publicly traded mutual insurers than the other types of insurers. Chapter 3 investigates how the ownership type of insurers and managerial discretion shapes the management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) section in the property and casualty insurers’ statutory annual reports. We compare and contrast the content in the disclosure between insurance companies of different ownership types. We obtain insights from applying the managerial discretion hypothesis to explain how insurers discuss different topics in their annual filings. We find at least forty percent of the topics in MD&As are significantly related to the ownership type. Moreover, we use three proxies related to the level of managerial discretion to find that insurers change their discussion of topics as the proxy for managerial discretion varies. These results suggest that insurers discuss less about their performance when the level of managerial discretion is lower. In addition, public stock companies (with higher levels of managerial discretion) have greater levels of discussion about topics related to stock prices. In addition, while our structural topic model was able to discern differences in topics between mutuals and stocks and between topics related to proxies for managerial discretion, a commonly used measure of text similarity (cosine similarity) was not able to discern differences between types of firms. In chapter 4, we study how the impact of enactments of disclosure regulations affects the content of textual disclosures by U.S. property and liability insurers. Since 2002 two major disclosure changes have affected insures in the US: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), and the Model Audit Rule (MAR). SOX and MAR apply to different types of (insurance) companies and become effective in different years. To identify the effect of regulation changes on insurer behavior, we use a two-stage difference-in-difference method (Gardner, 2021) which can account for the application of the new requirements at different times for companies headquartered in different states. We use two measures to summarize the content of textual disclosure: the importance of topics estimated by a topic modeling approach and the year-to-year cosine similarityscore of disclosures. We find that disclosure requirements affect the prevalence of eighty percent of the topics, and the enactment of requirements significantly increases the discussion for topics related to investment, reserves, losses, and exposures.
    ADA compliance
    For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
    Collections
    Theses and Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Temple University Libraries | 1900 N. 13th Street | Philadelphia, PA 19122
    (215) 204-8212 | scholarshare@temple.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.