Rapid Adoption of Telemedicine in Rheumatology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic Highlights Training and Supervision Concerns Among Rheumatology Trainees
Genre
Journal articleDate
2021-11-17Author
Yeoh, Su-AnnYoung, Kristen
Putman, Michael
Sattui, Sebastion
Conway, Richard
Graef, Elizabeth
Kilian, Adam
Konig, Maximilian
Sparks, Jeffrey
Ugarte-Gil, Manuel
Upton, Laura
Berenbaum, Francis
Bhana, Suleman
Costello, Wendy
Hausmann, Jonathan
Machado, Pedro
Robinson, Philip
Sirotich, Emily
Sufka, Paul
Yazdany, Jinoos
Liew, Jean
Grainger, Rebecca
Wallace, Zachary
Jayatilleke, Arundathi
Group
The Global Rheumatology AllianceDepartment
MedicinePermanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/7585
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11355Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of telemedicine use during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on rheumatology trainees. Methods: A voluntary, anonymous, web-based survey was administered in English, Spanish, or French from August 19 to October 5, 2020. Adult and pediatric rheumatology trainees were invited to participate via social media and email. Using multiple-choice questions and Likert scales, the survey assessed prior and current telemedicine use, impact on training, and supervision after COVID-19 prompted rapid telemedicine implementation. Results: Surveys were received from 302 trainees from 33 countries, with 83% in adult rheumatology training programs. Reported telemedicine use increased from 13% before the pandemic to 82% during the pandemic. United States trainees predominantly used video visits, whereas outside the United States telemedicine was predominantly audio only. Most (65%) evaluated new patients using telemedicine. More respondents were comfortable using telemedicine for follow-up patients (69%) than for new patients (25%). Only 39% of respondents reported receiving telemedicine-focused training, including instruction on software, clinical skills, and billing, whereas more than half of United States trainees (59%) had training. Postconsultation verbal discussion was the most frequent form of supervision; 24% reported no supervision. Trainees found that telemedicine negatively impacted supervision (50%) and the quality of clinical teaching received (70%), with only 9% reporting a positive impact. Conclusions: Despite widespread uptake of telemedicine, a low proportion of trainees received telemedicine training, and many lacked comfort in evaluating patients, particularly new patients. Inadequate supervision and clinical teaching were areas of concern. If telemedicine remains in widespread use, ensuring appropriate trainee supervision and teaching should be prioritized.Citation
Yeoh, S.-A., Young, K., Putman, M., Sattui, S., Conway, R., Graef, E., Kilian, A., Konig, M., Sparks, J., Ugarte-Gil, M., Upton, L., Berenbaum, F., Bhana, S., Costello, W., Hausmann, J., Machado, P., Robinson, P., Sirotich, E., Sufka, P., Yazdany, J., Liew, J., Grainger, R., Wallace, Z., Jayatilleke, A. and (2022), Rapid Adoption of Telemedicine in Rheumatology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic Highlights Training and Supervision Concerns Among Rheumatology Trainees. ACR Open Rheumatology, 4: 128-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11355Citation to related work
Wiley Open AccessHas part
ACR Open Rheumatology, Vol. 4, No. 2ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/7563
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND