• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Faculty/ Researcher Works
    • Faculty/ Researcher Works
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Faculty/ Researcher Works
    • Faculty/ Researcher Works
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of TUScholarShareCommunitiesDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenresThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenres

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutPeoplePoliciesHelp for DepositorsData DepositFAQs

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Measurement Issues of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health: Challenges and Opportunities

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    ZismanIlani-PostPrint-2017-09.pdf
    Size:
    446.1Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Genre
    Post-print
    Date
    2017-09-01
    Author
    Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth
    Rivero-Santana, Amado
    Alvarez-Perez, Yolanda
    Zisman-Ilani, Yaara cc
    |Kaminskiy, Emma
    Serrano Aquilar, Pedro
    Department
    Social and Behavioral Sciences
    Subject
    Measurement
    Patient involvement
    Mental health
    Outcomes
    Shared decision making
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/7521
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-01-2017-0004
    Abstract
    Purpose: Shared decision making (SDM) is a model of health care in which patients are involved in the decision-making process about their treatment, considering their preferences and concerns in a deliberative process with the health care provider. Many existing instruments assess the antecedents, process, or the outcomes of SDM. The purpose of this paper is to identify the SDM-related measures applied in a mental health context. Design/methodology/approach: The authors performed a systematic review in several electronic databases from 1990 to October 2016. Studies that assessed quantitatively one or more constructs related to SDM (antecedents, process, and outcomes) in the field of mental health were included. Findings: The authors included 87 studies that applied 48 measures on distinct SDM constructs. A large majority of them have been developed in the field of physical diseases and adapted or directly applied in the mental health context. The most evaluated construct is the SDM process in consultation, mainly by patients’ self-report but also by external observer measures, followed by the patients’ preferences for involvement in decision making. The most applied instrument was the Autonomy Preference Index, followed by the Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making (OPTION) and the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). The psychometric validation in mental health samples of the instruments identified is scarce. Research limitations/implications: The bibliographic search is comprehensive, but could not be completely exhaustive. Effort should be invested in the development of new SDM for mental health tools that will reflect the complexity and specific features of mental health care. Originality/value: The authors highlight several limitations and challenges for the measurement of SDM in mental health care.
    Citation
    Perestelo-Perez, L., Rivero-Santana, A., Alvarez-Perez, Y., Zisman-Ilani, Y., Kaminskiy, E., & Serrano Aguilar, P. (2017). Measurement issues of shared decision making in mental health: challenges and opportunities. Mental Health Review Journal, 22(3), 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-01-2017-0004
    Citation to related work
    Emerald Publishing Limited
    Has part
    Mental Health Review Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3
    ADA compliance
    For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/7499
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Faculty/ Researcher Works

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
    Temple University Libraries | 1900 N. 13th Street | Philadelphia, PA 19122
    (215) 204-8212 | scholarshare@temple.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.