GroupCenter for Public Health Law Research (Temple University Beasley School of Law)
SubjectCOVID-19 (Disease)--United States
COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020--United States
Public health laws
Abortion--Law and legislation--United States
Abortion--Government policy--United States
Abortion--Political aspects--United States
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/7478
MetadataShow full item record
CitationRebouché, Rachel & Adrienne Ghorashi, The Mess in Texas: Litigating COVID-19 Abortion Restrictions, (May 18, 2020), http://www.srhm.org/news/the-mess-in-texas-litigating-covid-19-abortion-restrictions/
Citation to related workSexual and Reproductive Health Matters (SRHM)
Has partSexual and Reproductive Health Matters Blog
ADA complianceFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
American Exception: Hegemony and the Tripartite StateYom, Sean L.; Mucciaroni, Gary; Fioretos, Karl Orfeo, 1966-; Kuznick, Peter J.; Phillips, Peter (Temple University. Libraries, 2020)This dissertation seeks to explain the uncanny continuity of hegemonic US foreign policy across presidential administrations and the breakdown of the rule of law as evidenced by unadjudicated state and elite criminality. It finds that a nebulous deep state predominates over politics and society. This deep state is comprised of institutions that advance the interests of the politico-economic elite through nexuses connecting the overworld of the corporate rich, the underworld of organized crime, and mediating national security organizations. To investigate the evolution of the state, the tripartite state construct is elucidated. It is a synthesis and expansion of three extant approaches—dual state theory, theories of the power elite, and the deep politics framework which explores the impactful forces and institutions whose influence is typically repressed rather than acknowledged in mainstream discourse. The tripartite state is comprised of the democratic or public state, the security state, and the deep state. A key contention herein is that the deep state developed alongside postwar US exceptionism—the institutionalized abrogation of the rule of law, ostensibly on the basis of “national security.” Theories of hegemony and empire are analyzed and critiqued and refined. To wit: the post-World War II US empire has been sustained by hegemonic institutions which rely on various degrees of consent and coercion—both in a dyadic sense but increasingly through structural dominance following the collapse of Bretton Woods. Rival hypotheses related to the state and US foreign policy are analyzed and critiqued. To explore the concept of a deep state within a nominal democracy, open democratic modes of power are contrasted with top-down or dark power. Through process tracing, the historical evolution of the US state is delineated, charting the means by which US imperial hegemony was reproduced. Presidential administrations and the Watergate scandal serve as case studies of sorts, illustrating the deep state’s role in the general thrust of postwar US politics—imperial hegemony over the international system. Finally, various deep state institutions are examined along with a discussion of generalizability, applications, and implications of the foregoing scholarship.
COVID-19 Law and Policy Briefings, Series Two: Supreme Court Hears Arguments on the Affordable Care ActGeorge Consortium; Center for Health Policy and Law (Northeastern University School of Law); Center for Public Health Law Research (Temple University Beasley School of Law); APHA Law Section (2020-11-12)Join Nicolas Terry of Indiana University, Sara Rosenbaum of George Washington University, and Nicole Huberfeld of Boston University, as they analyze the two upcoming Supreme Court cases that could determine the future of the Affordable Care Act and the tens of millions of Americans who rely on it for their healthcare.
COVID-19 Law and Policy Briefings, Series One: The Wisconsin DecisionGeorge Consortium; Center for Health Policy and Law (Northeastern University School of Law); Center for Public Health Law Research (Temple University Beasley School of Law); APHA Law Section (2020-05-19)The Wisconsin Supreme Court struck down on Wednesday the decision by Governor Tony Evers to extend a stay-at-home order. The 4-3 decision challenges the governor’s ability “to rely on emergency powers indefinitely,” and leaves residents in the state with only a patchwork of local and county-level orders to guide and protect them. In this Briefing, our panel discusses the decision and the precedent it sets, and where we could go from here. Recorded May 18, 2020.