COVID-19 Law and Policy Briefings, Series Two: The Role of the Courts: Religious Exemptions and the legacy of Jacobson v. Massachusetts
dc.creator | Burris, Scott | |
dc.creator | Vladeck, Steve | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-18T15:18:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-18T15:18:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-02-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | This Week in Health Law, COVID-19 Law and Policy Briefings, Series Two: The Role of the Courts: Religious Exemptions and the legacy of Jacobson v. Massachusetts, (February 23, 2021), https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/hvkda7/twihl_229.mp3. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/7400 | |
dc.description | The COVID-19 Law and Policy Briefings, hosted in two series from March 2020 through July 2021, feature US and international public health law experts discussing the biggest legal issues arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. The briefings are produced by the George Consortium, co-sponsored by the Center for Health Policy and Law at Northeastern University School of Law, the Center for Public Health Law Research at Temple University Beasley School of Law, and the APHA Law Section. Visit Public Health Law Watch (http://bit.ly/COVIDLawBriefing) to watch episodes. All past briefings are also archived by The Week in Health Law podcast. | |
dc.description.abstract | From the onset of the pandemic almost one year ago, the question of the government’s power to mandate public health protections has loomed large in the national conversation. Now, with the prospect of widespread vaccinations becoming a reality, the power (or lack thereof) of lawmakers to require their citizens be vaccinated in the name of public health has become more pressing than ever. We turn to Jacobson v. Massachusetts, the 1905 Supreme Court ruling that upheld the states’ ability to mandate vaccinations. How does Jacobson’s precedent and legacy affect today’s COVID response? What role will it play in the upcoming Supreme Court spring 2021 session? Find out more on this week’s COVID Policy Playbook briefing. | |
dc.format.extent | 00:20:51 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Center for Public Health Law Research | |
dc.relation.ispartof | COVID-19 Research | |
dc.relation.haspart | The Week in Health Law, Ep. 229 | |
dc.rights | All Rights Reserved | |
dc.subject | COVID-19 (Disease)--United States | |
dc.subject | COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020--United States | |
dc.subject | Public health laws | |
dc.subject | Courts--United States | |
dc.relation.youtube | https://youtu.be/RdMj_Mf6sl8 | |
dc.title | COVID-19 Law and Policy Briefings, Series Two: The Role of the Courts: Religious Exemptions and the legacy of Jacobson v. Massachusetts | |
dc.type | Sound | |
dc.type.genre | Audio recording | |
dc.contributor.group | George Consortium | |
dc.contributor.group | Center for Health Policy and Law (Northeastern University School of Law) | |
dc.contributor.group | Center for Public Health Law Research (Temple University Beasley School of Law) | |
dc.contributor.group | APHA Law Section | |
dc.description.department | Law | |
dc.relation.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/7378 | |
dc.ada.note | For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu | |
dc.description.schoolcollege | Temple University. James E. Beasley School of Law | |
dc.creator.orcid | Burris|0000-0002-6013-5842 | |
dc.temple.creator | Burris, Scott | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-02-18T15:18:52Z |