Genre
DatasetDate
2022-01-21Department
Department of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesInstitute on Disabilities
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/7252
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
To identify studies to include or consider for this systematic review, the review team worked with a medical librarian to develop detailed search strategies for each database. The search resulted in 1,986 studies (210 from grey literature sources). 279 duplicate studies were found and omitted using Endnote 20 for the deduplication of records and 1,707 references were eligible to screen. Studies were screened by title and abstract by two blinded and independent reviewers. If a tiebreaker was needed, a third reviewer was called in. This process was repeated for full text article screening and article selection.Description
To identify studies to include or consider for this systematic review, the review team worked with a medical librarian to develop detailed search strategies for each database. The search was developed for PubMed (NLM) and was translated to ERIC (EbscoHost), PsycInfo (EbscoHost) and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) using a combination of keywords and subject headings. A grey literature search included NIRS, AAIDD, PaTTAN/PA, Think College UMASS, ILRU, Pacer.org and the PCORI websites. The search excluded child studies and was limited by date from 2005 to Present. The final search was completed on November 24, 2021. The full search details are provided in Appendix(___). PubMed (NLM) from 01/01/2005 to 11/24/2021 (858 Results) ERIC (EbscoHost) from 01/01/2005 to 11/24/2021 (288 Results) PsycInfo (EbscoHost) from 01/01/2005 to 11/24/2021 (279 Results) Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) from 01/01/2005 to 11/24/2021 (341 Results) The search resulted in 1,986 studies (210 from grey literature sources). 279 duplicate studies were found and omitted using Endnote 20 for the deduplication of records and 1,707 references were eligible to screen. Studies were screened by title and abstract by two blinded and independent reviewers. If a tiebreaker was needed, a third reviewer was called in. This process was repeated for full text article screening and article selection.Citation
Roth, S., Pfeiffer B., Weiss K. E., et al. Search Strategies for a scoping review of peer support strategies for people with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD). November 24, 2021. Temple University Health Sciences Libraries, Systematic Review Service.ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/7231
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA