• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of TUScholarShareCommunitiesDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenresThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenres

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutPeoplePoliciesHelp for DepositorsData DepositFAQs

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    INVESTIGATING EXPERTISE: FOUR CASE STUDIES OF EXPERIENCED EFL TEACHERS IN JAPANESE UNIVERSITIES

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Asaba_temple_0225E_13816.pdf
    Size:
    2.303Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Genre
    Thesis/Dissertation
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Asaba, Mayumi
    Advisor
    Casanave, Christine Pearson, 1944-
    Committee member
    Beglar, David J.
    Churchill, Eton, 1964-
    Okada, Hanako
    Department
    Applied Linguistics
    Subject
    Education
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/705
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/687
    Abstract
    These case studies of four experienced teachers are focused on attributes that indicated expertise in L2 teaching in Japanese universities. In order to select participants who were likely to demonstrate characteristics of expertise, I modified and used the criteria based on previous expertise research in general education. The criteria included three factors: experience, educational backgrounds, and recommendations. I chose to focus only on effective teachers because the purpose of this study was to examine characteristics that were suggestive of expertise. Data sources included classroom observations, interviews with focal participants and focus groups of students, and a collection of artifacts. Classroom observations took place in a minimum of four lessons in each of two different classes that participants taught. Furthermore, I conducted and audio recorded a minimum of five interviews with each participant. Moreover, a collection of artifacts, such as syllabi, handouts, and tests that the participants created and used provided insights into these teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about language learning and teaching. Student-focus group interviews were conducted to explore congruences between students’ and teachers’ perceptions of classes. Data analysis included both deductive and inductive approaches. First, I relied on the findings of previous research in the field. For example, I looked for characteristics proposed by Bereiter and Scardamalia (1993), who explained how experts solve problems differently from nonexperts. They argued that nonexperts solve problems to make their jobs easier. In contrast, experts find and solve new and important issues in their domain, which they called progressive problem solving. In addition, based on the conception that knowledge and beliefs are different (Nespor, 1987), teachers’ beliefs, which influenced teachers’ developmental processes and use of knowledge, were examined. Furthermore, Shulman’s (1986, 1987) and Turner-Bisset’s (2012) notion of teacher knowledge guided the examination of the participants’ knowledge bases. Second, recurring themes other than what has been discussed in previous expertise studies were examined. The results indicated three characteristics of these participants. First, since they first entered the field of teaching English, they continued to develop based on reflection and problem-solving. The nature of reflection was critical, in which they examined their teaching based on students’ reactions. Their reflection also led them to engage in problem-solving. Rather than simplifying issues to make their jobs easier, they sought ways to effectively enhance students’ learning by revising their materials. The nature of their problem-solving was similar to Bereiter and Scardamalia’s (1993) description of experts, who engage in progressive problem-solving. Second, these teachers indicated their beliefs related to teacher autonomy and teacher integrity. Autonomy that these participants found in their contexts allowed them to teach based on their beliefs. In addition, autonomy allowed them to achieve agency to find and work on issues that they believed important and challenging. Consequently, their problem-solving enhanced their growth. Moreover, autonomy allowed them to have flow experiences, in which they were able to enjoy the process of problem-solving. Furthermore, the participants demonstrated their strong beliefs related to their sense of integrity towards their professions. Integrity that they felt towards their professions pushed them to work harder and allowed them to positively approach teaching and students. However, the findings also suggested that teacher integrity could be compromised when teachers faced issues such as lack of job security and teacher burnout. The final aspect was the participants’ sophisticated knowledge of learners, an integral component for excellent teaching (Shulman, 1986, 1987). The participants’ knowledge of learners was categorized into two models suggested by Turner-Bisset (2012). One is social knowledge of learners, and the other is cognitive knowledge of learners. The teachers understood what students were like as well as their cognitive development of learners and used their knowledge of learners to set up learning activities that would help students achieve goals. They also used assessments effectively to develop and refine knowledge of learners. Furthermore, their knowledge of learners allowed them to approach teaching in a flexible manner. This dissertation concludes with pedagogical implications for teachers, teacher educators, school administrators, curriculum designers. In addition, limitations of this study and a proposal for further research are provided.
    ADA compliance
    For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
    Collections
    Theses and Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Temple University Libraries | 1900 N. 13th Street | Philadelphia, PA 19122
    (215) 204-8212 | scholarshare@temple.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.