• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of TUScholarShareCommunitiesDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenresThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenres

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutPeoplePoliciesHelp for DepositorsData DepositFAQs

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    An Examination of Timing Variables in Liquid Taste Administration fMRI Paradigms

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Arlt_temple_0225E_13368.pdf
    Size:
    5.796Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Genre
    Thesis/Dissertation
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Arlt, Jean M.
    Advisor
    Chen, Eunice Y.
    Committee member
    Alloy, Lauren B.
    Conklin, Christopher
    Giovannetti, Tania
    McCloskey, Michael S.
    Olino, Thomas
    Department
    Psychology
    Subject
    Psychology, Clinical
    Psychology
    Fmri
    Liquid Administration
    Chocolate Milkshake
    Taste Stimulus
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/702
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/684
    Abstract
    Use of liquid administration paradigms in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research has rapidly increased and expanded. Despite rapid expansion, there are no studies examining the methods setup of this paradigm. The present study aims to address basic questions about the methodology of liquid administration paradigms using a series of three experiments. These questions include whether using timing files generated by the study computer accurately represent the time of taste receipt, whether variation in methods setup meaningfully impacts time of taste receipt, and whether inaccurate receipt time impacts first-level analysis of fMRI data. Experiment 1 used an equipment setup simulating the running of an fMRI study with three taste stimuli; tasteless solution, chocolate milkshake, and chocolate milk. For each taste stimulus, we captured and compared the times of administration recorded by the study computer and the time of receipt captured using two measurement systems. Experiment 2 used a similar setup with only one taste stimulus: chocolate milkshake. Using high-definition video, we captured the time elapsed as the taste stimulus passed through the tubing at three infusion speeds and varying temperatures. In Experiment 3, we used the fMRI data from a previous study, in which five participants were administered chocolate milkshake to demonstrate how the lag times captured in Experiment 1 affect first-level fMRI data analyses. There were significant differences in time of administration recorded by the computer and time of receipt, demonstrating the existence of a lag time. This lag time was greatest for chocolate milkshake. Semiautomatic pump speed also was significantly associated with lag time. Temperature and length of tubing were not significantly related to lag time. Additionally, our fMRI analyses show that the variation in the methods setup have a meaningful impact on first-level fMRI analyses. When using the computer-generated time that was not corrected for lag time, increased neural activity in response to the chocolate milkshake taste was shown in three out of the five participants. When correcting using the lag time, increased neural activity in response to chocolate milkshake taste was found in all five participants. Overall, this study demonstrates a “proof of concept” that the practice of estimating liquid administration times from computer-generated files may not be accurate, that variation in methods setup may affect the timing in this paradigm, and that these differences in timing introduce variation in the fMRI data of individual participants.
    ADA compliance
    For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
    Collections
    Theses and Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Temple University Libraries | 1900 N. 13th Street | Philadelphia, PA 19122
    (215) 204-8212 | scholarshare@temple.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.