Silence: Insolubly Ambiguous and Deadly: The Constitutional, Evidentiary and Moral Reasons for Excluding Lack of Remorse Testimony and Argument in Capital Sentencing Proceedings
dc.creator | Epstein, Jules | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-20T20:21:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-20T20:21:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Jules Epstein, Silence: Insolubly Ambiguous and Deadly: The Constitutional, Evidentiary and Moral Reasons for Excluding Lack of Remorse Testimony and Argument in Capital Sentencing Proceedings, 14 TEMP. POL. & CIV. RTS. L. REV. 45 (2004). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/6750 | |
dc.format.extent | 44 pages | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Faculty/ Researcher Works | |
dc.relation.haspart | Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review, Vol. 14, Iss. 1 | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | Temple University Beasley School of Law | |
dc.rights | All Rights Reserved | |
dc.title | Silence: Insolubly Ambiguous and Deadly: The Constitutional, Evidentiary and Moral Reasons for Excluding Lack of Remorse Testimony and Argument in Capital Sentencing Proceedings | |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.type.genre | Journal article | |
dc.relation.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6732 | |
dc.ada.note | For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu | |
dc.description.schoolcollege | Temple University. James E. Beasley School of Law | |
dc.temple.creator | Epstein, Jules | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-07-20T20:21:44Z |