Show simple item record

dc.creatorEpstein, Jules
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-20T20:21:44Z
dc.date.available2021-07-20T20:21:44Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationJules Epstein, Silence: Insolubly Ambiguous and Deadly: The Constitutional, Evidentiary and Moral Reasons for Excluding Lack of Remorse Testimony and Argument in Capital Sentencing Proceedings, 14 TEMP. POL. & CIV. RTS. L. REV. 45 (2004).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/6750
dc.format.extent44 pages
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofFaculty/ Researcher Works
dc.relation.haspartTemple Political and Civil Rights Law Review, Vol. 14, Iss. 1
dc.relation.isreferencedbyTemple University Beasley School of Law
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved
dc.titleSilence: Insolubly Ambiguous and Deadly: The Constitutional, Evidentiary and Moral Reasons for Excluding Lack of Remorse Testimony and Argument in Capital Sentencing Proceedings
dc.typeText
dc.type.genreJournal article
dc.relation.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6732
dc.ada.noteFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
dc.description.schoolcollegeTemple University. James E. Beasley School of Law
dc.temple.creatorEpstein, Jules
refterms.dateFOA2021-07-20T20:21:44Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Epstein-JournalArticle-2004.pdf
Size:
2.586Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record