Show simple item record

dc.creatorEpstein, Jules
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-20T20:21:43Z
dc.date.available2021-07-20T20:21:43Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationJules Epstein, Preferring the "Wise Man" to Science: The Failure of Courts and Non-Litigation Mechanisms to Demand Validity in Forensic Matching Testimony, 20 WIDENER L. REV. 81 (2014).
dc.identifier.issn1933-5555
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/6742
dc.description.abstractThe 2009 report Strengthening Forensic Science: A Path Forward, issued by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences, made clear that many forensic disciplines - handwriting analysis, latent print [fingerprint] comparison, ballistics matching, fire [arson] causation and more - lacked a foundation in hard science and offered claims of "individualization" [attributing the crime scene evidence to only one possible source in the world] without a proper research foundation. The Report described the judicial system as "utterly ineffective" in understanding the limits of these disciplines and policing admissibility. Five years later, virtually no change has occurred, with such evidence continuing to come in without qualification or tempering. This Article reviews the post-report years and assesses the causes of this stasis - the lack of rigor in the Frye and Daubert admissibility regimes, the scientific 'illiteracy' of many legal professionals, inadequate funding for expert services, and a comfort with the status quo of evidence relied upon for decades. The Article then surveys non-litigation mechanisms such as forensic science commissions and finds them also wanting in their ability to respond to the Report's criticisms. The Article concludes that a tolerance of "wise man" testimony over science will persist, absent crises such as DNA exonerations that expose flawed forensics, unless a major institutional push occurs or there is a new stringency imported into the "gatekeeping" function performed by judges.
dc.format.extent38 pages
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofFaculty/ Researcher Works
dc.relation.haspartWidener Law Review, Vol. 20
dc.relation.isreferencedbyWidener University School of Law
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved
dc.subjectForensic science
dc.subjectEvidence
dc.subjectCriminal law
dc.titlePreferring the Wise Man to Science: The Failure of Courts and Non-Litigation Mechanisms to Demand Validity in Forensic Matching Testimony
dc.typeText
dc.type.genreJournal article
dc.relation.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6724
dc.ada.noteFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
dc.description.schoolcollegeTemple University. James E. Beasley School of Law
dc.temple.creatorEpstein, Jules
refterms.dateFOA2021-07-20T20:21:43Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Epstein-JournalArticle-2014-.pdf
Size:
38.53Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record