Genre
Journal articleDate
2011-07Author
Lipson, Jonathan C.Subject
Good faith (Law)Corporate governance
Laws, regulations and rules
Bankruptcy reorganizations
Lender liability
Breach of contract
Models
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/6661
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6643Abstract
Firms rarely go from solvency to Chapter 11 in an instant. Instead, the slide into bankruptcy will be marked by a period (the “zone of distress”) that begins with the breach of a lending contract and ends, perhaps months or even years later, with either a formal bankruptcy case or some other resolution, such as a nonbankruptcy restructuring or liquidation. In this period, the firm’s governance will be up for grabs. Doctrinally, state corporate law gives directors the power and responsibility to manage the firm for the benefit of shareholders, subject to fiduciary review. In fact, however, real control shifts away from directors and shareholders to creditors. Yet, the law offers little to check this control. Creditors are not generally viewed as fiduciaries, and so they owe their borrowers neither duties of care nor loyalty. In theory, regulation or contract could channel creditor conduct in the zone of distress, but three fundamental changes in the dynamics among distressed firms and their investors have weakened these constraints.Citation
Jonathan C. Lipson, Governance in the Breach: Controlling Creditor Opportunism, 84 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1035 (2011).Available at: https://southerncalifornialawreview.com/2011/07/03/governance-in-the-breach-controlling-creditor-opportunism-article-by-jonathan-c-lipson/