• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Faculty/ Researcher Works
    • Faculty/ Researcher Works
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Faculty/ Researcher Works
    • Faculty/ Researcher Works
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of TUScholarShareCommunitiesDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenresThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenres

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutPeoplePoliciesHelp for DepositorsData DepositFAQs

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    The Missing Instrument: Dirty Input Limits

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Sinden-JournalArticle-2009.pdf
    Size:
    3.267Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Genre
    Journal article
    Date
    2009
    Author
    Driesen, David M.
    Sinden, Amy
    Subject
    Environment
    Environmental
    Regulation
    Climate change
    Global warming
    Regulatory instruments
    Instrument choice
    Emissions trading
    Upstream
    Downstream
    Inputs
    Outputs
    Fossil fuels
    Cap and trade
    Pollution prevention
    End-of-the-pipe
    Show allShow less
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/6628
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6610
    Abstract
    This article evaluates an environmental protection instrument that the literature has hitherto largely overlooked, Dirty Input Limits (DILs), quantitative limits on the inputs that cause pollution. DILs provide an alternative to cumbersome output-based emissions trading and performance standards. DILs have played a role in some of the world's most prominent environmental success stories. They have also begun to influence climate change policy, because of the impossibility of imposing an output-based cap on transport emissions. We evaluate DILs' administrative advantages, efficiency, dynamic properties, and capacity to better integrate environmental protection efforts. DILs, we show, not only have significant advantages that make them a good policy tool, they also have the capacity to help us fruitfully reconceptualize environmental law in more holistic fashion.
    Citation
    David M. Driesen & Amy Sinden, The Missing Instrument: Dirty Input Limits, 33 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 66 (2009).
    Available at: https://harvardelr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2019/07/33.1-Driesen-and-Sinden.pdf
    Citation to related work
    Harvard Law School
    Has part
    Harvard Environmental Law Review, Vol. 33, Iss. 1
    ADA compliance
    For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
    Collections
    Faculty/ Researcher Works

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
    Temple University Libraries | 1900 N. 13th Street | Philadelphia, PA 19122
    (215) 204-8212 | scholarshare@temple.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.