Genre
Journal articleDate
2009Author
Driesen, David M.Sinden, Amy
Subject
EnvironmentEnvironmental
Regulation
Climate change
Global warming
Regulatory instruments
Instrument choice
Emissions trading
Upstream
Downstream
Inputs
Outputs
Fossil fuels
Cap and trade
Pollution prevention
End-of-the-pipe
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/6628
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6610Abstract
This article evaluates an environmental protection instrument that the literature has hitherto largely overlooked, Dirty Input Limits (DILs), quantitative limits on the inputs that cause pollution. DILs provide an alternative to cumbersome output-based emissions trading and performance standards. DILs have played a role in some of the world's most prominent environmental success stories. They have also begun to influence climate change policy, because of the impossibility of imposing an output-based cap on transport emissions. We evaluate DILs' administrative advantages, efficiency, dynamic properties, and capacity to better integrate environmental protection efforts. DILs, we show, not only have significant advantages that make them a good policy tool, they also have the capacity to help us fruitfully reconceptualize environmental law in more holistic fashion.Citation
David M. Driesen & Amy Sinden, The Missing Instrument: Dirty Input Limits, 33 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 66 (2009).Available at: https://harvardelr.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2019/07/33.1-Driesen-and-Sinden.pdf