Show simple item record

dc.creatorSciurba, Frank C.
dc.creatorErnst, Armin
dc.creatorHerth, Felix J.F.
dc.creatorStrange, Charlie
dc.creatorCriner, Gerard J.
dc.creatorMarquette, Charles H.
dc.creatorKovitz, Kevin L.
dc.creatorChiacchierini, Richard P.
dc.creatorGoldin, Jonathan
dc.creatorMcLennan, Geoffrey
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-21T14:49:10Z
dc.date.available2021-05-21T14:49:10Z
dc.date.issued2010-09-23
dc.identifier.citationSciurba FC, Ernst A, Herth FJF, et al. for the VENT Study Research Group. A Randomized Study of Endobronchial Valves for Advanced Emphysema. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010; 363:1233-1244. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0900928.
dc.identifier.issn1533-4406
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6381
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/6399
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Endobronchial valves that allow air to escape from a pulmonary lobe but not enter it can induce a reduction in lobar volume that may thereby improve lung function and exercise tolerance in patients with pulmonary hyperinflation related to advanced emphysema. METHODS: We compared the safety and efficacy of endobronchial-valve therapy in patients with heterogeneous emphysema versus standard medical care. Efficacy end points were percent changes in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and the 6-minute walk test on intention-to-treat analysis. We assessed safety on the basis of the rate of a composite of six major complications. RESULTS: Of 321 enrolled patients, 220 were randomly assigned to receive endobronchial valves (EBV group) and 101 to receive standard medical care (control group). At 6 months, there was an increase of 4.3% in the FEV1 in the EBV group (an increase of 1.0 percentage point in the percent of the predicted value), as compared with a decrease of 2.5% in the control group (a decrease of 0.9 percentage point in the percent of the predicted value). Thus, there was a mean between-group difference of 6.8% in the FEV1 (P=0.005). Roughly similar between-group differences were observed for the 6-minute walk test. At 12 months, the rate of the complications composite was 10.3% in the EBV group versus 4.6% in the control group (P=0.17). At 90 days, in the EBV group, as compared with the control group, there were increased rates of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring hospitalization (7.9% vs. 1.1%, P=0.03) and hemoptysis (6.1% vs. 0%, P=0.01). The rate of pneumonia in the target lobe in the EBV group was 4.2% at 12 months. Greater radiographic evidence of emphysema heterogeneity and fissure completeness was associated with an enhanced response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Endobronchial-valve treatment for advanced heterogeneous emphysema induced modest improvements in lung function, exercise tolerance, and symptoms at the cost of more frequent exacerbations of COPD, pneumonia, and hemoptysis after implantation. (Funded by Pulmonx; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00129584.)
dc.format.extent12 pages
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofFaculty/ Researcher Works
dc.relation.haspartNew England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 36
dc.relation.isreferencedbyCopyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved
dc.titleA Randomized Study of Endobronchial Valves for Advanced Emphysema
dc.typeText
dc.type.genreJournal article
dc.contributor.groupVENT Study Research Group
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0900928
dc.ada.noteFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
dc.description.schoolcollegeLewis Katz School of Medicine
dc.temple.creatorCriner, Gerard J.
refterms.dateFOA2021-05-21T14:49:10Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Criner-JournalArticle-2010-09- ...
Size:
683.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record