Non-Faith-Based Arguments against Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia
Genre
Journal articleDate
2016-08-01Author
Sulmasy, Daniel P.Travaline, John M.
Mitchell, Louise A.
Ely, E. Wesley
Group
Catholic Medical AssociationDepartment
Thoracic Medicine and SurgeryPermanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/6392
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00243639.2016.1201375Abstract
This article is a complement to “A Template for Non-Religious-Based Discussions Against Euthanasia” by Melissa Harintho, Nathaniel Bloodworth, and E. Wesley Ely which appeared in the February 2015 Linacre Quarterly. Herein we build upon Daniel Sulmasy's opening and closing arguments from the 2014 Intelligence Squared debate on legalizing assisted suicide, supplemented by other non-faith-based arguments and thoughts, providing four nontheistic arguments against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia: (1) “it offends me”; (2) slippery slope; (3) “pain can be alleviated”; (4) physician integrity and patient trust. Lay Summary: Presented here are four non-religious, reasonable arguments against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia: (1) “it offends me,” suicide devalues human life; (2) slippery slope, the limits on euthanasia gradually erode; (3) “pain can be alleviated,” palliative care and modern therapeutics more and more adequately manage pain; (4) physician integrity and patient trust, participating in suicide violates the integrity of the physician and undermines the trust patients place in physicians to heal and not to harm.Citation
Sulmasy DP, Travaline JM, Mitchell LA, Ely EW. Non-Faith-Based Arguments against Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia. The Linacre Quarterly. 2016;83(3):246-257. doi:10.1080/00243639.2016.1201375Citation to related work
SAGE PublicationsHas part
The Linacre Quarterly, Vol. 83, Iss. 3, 2016ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6374