A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Zephyr Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Heterogeneous Emphysema (LIBERATE)
Genre
Post-printDate
2018-05-22Author
Criner, Gerard J.Sue, Richard
Wright, Shawn
Dransfield, Mark
Rivas-Perez, Hiram
Wiese, Tanya
Sciurba, Frank C.
Shah, Pallav L.
Wahidi, Momen M.
Goulart de Oliveira, Hugo
Morrissey, Brian
Cardoso, Paulo F. G.
Hays, Steven
Majid, Adnan
Pastis, Nicholas, Jr.
Kopas, Lisa
Vollenweider, Mark
McFadden, P. Michael
Machuzak, Michael
Hsia, David W.
Sung, Arthur
Jarad, Nabil
Kornaszewska, Malgorzata
Hazelrigg, Stephen
Krishna, Ganesh
Armstrong, Brian
Shargill, Narinder S.
Slebos, Dirk-Jan
Group
LIBERATE Study GroupDepartment
Thoracic Medicine and SurgeryPermanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/6389
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201803-0590OCAbstract
Rationale: This is the first multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Zephyr Endobronchial Valve (EBV) in patients with little to no collateral ventilation out to 12 months. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Zephyr EBV in heterogeneous emphysema with little to no collateral ventilation in the treated lobe. Methods: Subjects were enrolled with a 2:1 randomization (EBV/standard of care [SoC]) at 24 sites. Primary outcome at 12 months was the ΔEBV–SoC of subjects with a post-bronchodilator FEV1 improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to 15%. Secondary endpoints included absolute changes in post-bronchodilator FEV1, 6-minute-walk distance, and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire scores. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 190 subjects (128 EBV and 62 SoC) were randomized. At 12 months, 47.7% EBV and 16.8% SoC subjects had a ΔFEV1 greater than or equal to 15% (P < 0.001). ΔEBV–SoC at 12 months was statistically and clinically significant: for FEV1, 0.106 L (P < 0.001); 6-minute-walk distance, +39.31 m (P = 0.002); and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, −7.05 points (P = 0.004). Significant ΔEBV–SoC were also observed in hyperinflation (residual volume, −522 ml; P < 0.001), modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (−0.8 points; P < 0.001), and the BODE (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity) index (−1.2 points). Pneumothorax was the most common serious adverse event in the treatment period (procedure to 45 d), in 34/128 (26.6%) of EBV subjects. Four deaths occurred in the EBV group during this phase, and one each in the EBV and SoC groups between 46 days and 12 months. Conclusions: Zephyr EBV provides clinically meaningful benefits in lung function, exercise tolerance, dyspnea, and quality of life out to at least 12 months, with an acceptable safety profile in patients with little or no collateral ventilation in the target lobe. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01796392).Citation
Criner GJ, Sue R, Wright S, et al. for the LIBERATE Study Group. A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Zephyr Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Heterogeneous Emphysema (LIBERATE). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(9):1151-1164. doi:10.1164/rccm.201803-0590OC.Citation to related work
American Thoracic SocietyHas part
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 198, Iss. 9ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6371