A Functionalist Approach to Comparative Abortion Law
|Rachel Rebouché, A Functionalist Approach to Comparative Abortion Law, in Rethinking Abortion and the Law: A Transnational Perspective 98 (Rebecca J. Cook, et al. eds., 2014).
|This chapter critiques the present comparative methodology in abortion law and explores the possibilities of a new comparative approach. The current method relies on high- profile but dated constitutional abortion decisions from the United States and Germany. Courts continue to rely on these cases to justify their decisions as consistent with a modern, global convergence around women’s rights and to minimize national resistance to contested law reform. These comparisons, however, oversimplify legal developments of the past forty years by focusing on constitutional norms and legislative regimes, rather than on the relationship between abortion law and practice.
|Faculty/ Researcher Works
|Rethinking Abortion and the Law: A Transnational Perspective (Rebecca J. Cook, et al. eds., 2014).
|Copyright © 2014 University of Pennsylvania Press
|All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations used for purposes of scholarly citation, none of this work may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher. For information address the University of Pennsylvania Press, 3905 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4112.
|All Rights Reserved
|A Functionalist Approach to Comparative Abortion Law
|For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org
|Temple University. James E. Beasley School of Law