Interpretation Consistent with International Law? The Detention of Asylum Seekers in South Africa
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/6205
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractOn paper, South African law concerning detention of asylum seekers appears consistent with international standards. However, the text of the Act is vague and overly broad, permitting interpretations inconsistent with international human rights standards. Further, in practice, officials often fail to uphold even the lowest standards of the Act, in violation of South African law. In order to protect the rights of asylum seekers, the South African government should institute formal guidelines and training programs, as well as a system of strong supervision and accountability, to ensure that the Act and Regulations are interpreted in a manner consistent with international law. Such a step will enable South Africa to live up to its noble post-apartheid human rights ideals.
CitationJaya Ramji, Interpretation Consistent with International Law? The Detention of Asylum Seekers in South Africa, 20(3) Refuge 1 (2002).
Has partRefuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, Vol. 20, No. 3 (2002): Detaining the Displaced
ADA complianceFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC