What’s in a name? Why these proteins are intrinsically disordered
Genre
Journal ArticleReview
Date
2013-01Author
Dunker, A KeithBabu, M Madan
Barbar, Elisar
Blackledge, Martin
Bondos, Sarah E
Dosztányi, Zsuzsanna
Dyson, H Jane
Forman-Kay, Julie
Fuxreiter, Monika
Gsponer, Jörg
Han, Kyou-Hoon
Jones, David T
Longhi, Sonia
Metallo, Steven J
Nishikawa, Ken
Nussinov, Ruth
Obradovic, Zoran
Pappu, Rohit V
Rost, Burkhard
Selenko, Philipp
Subramaniam, Vinod
Sussman, Joel L
Tompa, Peter
Uversky, Vladimir N
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/5970
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
10.4161/idp.24157Abstract
"What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet." From "Romeo and Juliet", William Shakespeare (1594) This article opens a series of publications on disambiguation of the basic terms used in the field of intrinsically disordered proteins. We start from the beginning, namely from the explanation of what the expression "intrinsically disordered protein" actually means and why this particular term has been chosen as the common denominator for this class of proteins characterized by broad structural, dynamic and functional characteristics.Citation to related work
Informa UK LimitedHas part
Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/5952