Show simple item record

dc.creatorKrebs, EE
dc.creatorLorenz, KA
dc.creatorBair, MJ
dc.creatorDamush, TM
dc.creatorWu, J
dc.creatorSutherland, JM
dc.creatorAsch, SM
dc.creatorKroenke, K
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-01T00:34:21Z
dc.date.available2021-02-01T00:34:21Z
dc.date.issued2009-06-01
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734
dc.identifier.issn1525-1497
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/5560
dc.identifier.other19418100 (pubmed)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/5578
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Inadequate pain assessment is a barrier to appropriate pain management, but single-item "pain screening" provides limited information about chronic pain. Multidimensional pain measures such as the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) are widely used in pain specialty and research settings, but are impractical for primary care. A brief and straightforward multidimensional pain measure could potentially improve initial assessment and follow-up of chronic pain in primary care. OBJECTIVES: To develop an ultra-brief pain measure derived from the BPI. DESIGN: Development of a shortened three-item pain measure and initial assessment of its reliability, validity, and responsiveness. PARTICIPANTS: We used data from 1) a longitudinal study of 500 primary care patients with chronic pain and 2) a cross-sectional study of 646 veterans recruited from ambulatory care. RESULTS: Selected items assess average pain intensity (P), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and interference with general activity (G). Reliability of the three-item scale (PEG) was α∈=∈0.73 and 0.89 in the two study samples. Overall, construct validity of the PEG was good for various pain-specific measures (r∈=∈0.60-0.89 in Study 1 and r∈=∈0.77-0.95 in Study 2), and comparable to that of the BPI. The PEG was sensitive to change and differentiated between patients with and without pain improvement at 6 months. DISCUSSION: We provide strong initial evidence for reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the PEG among primary care and other ambulatory clinic patients. The PEG may be a practical and useful tool to improve assessment and monitoring of chronic pain in primary care. © 2009 Society of General Internal Medicine.
dc.format.extent733-738
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.haspartJournal of General Internal Medicine
dc.relation.isreferencedbySpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectpain
dc.subjectmeasurement
dc.subjectprimary care
dc.titleDevelopment and Initial Validation of the PEG, a Three-item Scale Assessing Pain Intensity and Interference
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.genreJournal Article
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s11606-009-0981-1
dc.ada.noteFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
dc.date.updated2021-02-01T00:34:18Z
refterms.dateFOA2021-02-01T00:34:21Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Development and initial validation ...
Size:
170.8Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record