Show simple item record

dc.creatorMorrison, AB
dc.creatorConway, ARA
dc.creatorChein, JM
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-31T17:39:02Z
dc.date.available2021-01-31T17:39:02Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-24
dc.identifier.issn1662-5161
dc.identifier.issn1662-5161
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/5307
dc.identifier.other301ZR (isidoc)
dc.identifier.other24478672 (pubmed)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/5325
dc.description.abstractOngoing debate surrounds the capacity and characteristics of the focus of attention. The present study investigates whether a pattern of larger recency effects and smaller primacy effects reported in previous working memory studies is specific to task conditions used in those studies, or generalizes across manipulations of task-demand. Two experiments varied task-demands by requiring participants to remember lists of letters and to then respond to a subsequent two-item probe by indicating either the item that was presented later in the list (judgment of recency) or the item was presented earlier (judgment of primacy). Analyses tested the prediction that a WM task emphasizing later items in a list (judgment of recency) would encourage exaggerated recency effects and attenuated primacy effects, while a task emphasizing earlier items (judgment of primacy) would encourage exaggerated primacy effects and attenuated recency effects. Behavioral results from two experiments confirmed this prediction. In contrast to past studies, fMRI contrasts revealed no brain regions where activity was significantly altered by the presence of recency items in the probe, for either task condition. However, presence of the primacy item in the probe significantly influenced activity in frontal lobe brain regions linked to active maintenance, but the location and direction of activation changes varied as a function of task instructions. In sum, two experiments demonstrate that the behavioral and neural signatures of WM, specifically related to primacy and recency effects, are dependent on task-demands. Findings are discussed as they inform models of the structure and capacity of WM. © 2014 Morrison, Conway and Chein.
dc.format.extent6-
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.haspartFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
dc.relation.isreferencedbyFrontiers Media SA
dc.rightsCC BY
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.subjectworking memory
dc.subjectfocus of attention
dc.subjectprimacy and recency effects
dc.subjectphonological rehearsal
dc.subjectmedial temporal lobe
dc.titlePrimacy and recency effects as indices of the focus of attention
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.genreJournal Article
dc.relation.doi10.3389/fnhum.2014.00006
dc.ada.noteFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
dc.date.updated2021-01-31T17:38:58Z
refterms.dateFOA2021-01-31T17:39:02Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Primacy and recency effects as ...
Size:
873.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY