Recruiting Community partners for Veggie Van: Strategies and lessons learned from a mobile market intervention in North Carolina, 2012-2015
Genre
Journal ArticleDate
2017-04-01Author
Tripicchio, GLSmith, JG
Armstrong-Brown, J
McGuirt, J
Haynes-Maslow, L
Mardovich, S
Ammerman, AS
Leone, L
Subject
CommerceCommunity Health Services
Community-Based Participatory Research
Community-Institutional Relations
Food Supply
Fruit
Health Promotion
Humans
North Carolina
Vegetables
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/4913
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
10.5888/pcd14.160475Abstract
Background Food access interventions are promising strategies for improving dietary intake, which is associated with better health. However, studies examining the relationship between food access and intake are limited to observational designs, indicating a need for more rigorous approaches. The Veggie Van (VV) program was a cluster-randomized intervention designed to address the gap between food access and intake. In this article, we aim to describe the approaches involved in recruiting community partners to participate in VV. Community Context The VV mobile market aimed to improve access to fresh fruits and vegetables by providing subsidized, high-quality, local produce in low-resource communities in North Carolina. This study describes the strategies and considerations involved in recruiting community partners and individual participants for participation in the VV program and evaluation. Methods To recruit partners, we used various strategies, including a site screener to identify potential partners, interest forms to gauge future VV use and prioritize enrollment of a high-need population, marketing materials to promote VV, site liaisons to coordinate community outreach, and a memorandum of understanding between all invested parties. Outcome A total of 53 community organizations and 725 participants were approached for recruitment. Ultimately, 12 sites and 201 participants were enrolled. Enrollment took 38 months, but our approaches helped successfully recruit a low-income, low-access population. The process took longer than anticipated, and funding constraints prevented certain strategies from being implemented. Interpretation Recruiting community partners and members for participation in a multi-level, community-based intervention was challenging. Strategies and lessons learned can inform future studies.Citation to related work
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)Has part
Preventing Chronic DiseaseADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/4895
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/