Cluster randomized controlled trial of a mobile market intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake among adults in lower-income communities in North Carolina
Genre
Journal ArticleDate
2018-01-05Author
Leone, LATripicchio, GL
Haynes-Maslow, L
McGuirt, J
Grady Smith, JS
Armstrong-Brown, J
Gizlice, Z
Ammerman, A
Subject
Cluster-randomized trialFood environment
Fruits and vegetables
Lower-income
Mobile market
Adult
Consumer Behavior
Cooking
Diet
Feeding Behavior
Female
Fruit
Health Behavior
Health Promotion
Humans
Male
Marketing
Middle Aged
North Carolina
Nutritional Status
Poverty
Program Evaluation
Retrospective Studies
Self Efficacy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vegetables
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/4805
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
10.1186/s12966-017-0637-1Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poorer diets and subsequent higher rates of chronic disease among lower-income individuals may be partially attributed to reduced access to fresh fruits and vegetables (F&V) and other healthy foods. Mobile markets are an increasingly popular method for providing access to F&V in underserved communities, but evaluation efforts are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of Veggie Van (VV), a mobile produce market, on F&V intake in lower-income communities using a group randomized controlled trial. METHODS: VV is a mobile produce market that sells reduced-cost locally grown produce and offers nutrition and cooking education. We recruited 12 sites in lower-income communities in North Carolina (USA) to host VV, randomizing them to receive VV immediately (intervention) or after the 6-month study period (delayed intervention control). Participants at each site completed baseline and follow-up surveys including F&V intake, perceived access to fresh F&V and self-efficacy for purchasing, preparing and eating F&V. We used multiple linear regression to calculate adjusted differences in outcomes while controlling for baseline values, education and clustering within site. RESULTS: Among 142 participants who completed the follow-up, baseline F&V intake was 3.48 cups/day for control and 3.33 for intervention. At follow-up, adjusted change in F&V consumption was 0.95 cups/day greater for intervention participants (p = 0.005), but was attenuated to 0.51 cups per day (p = 0.11) after removing extreme values. VV customers increased their F&V consumption by 0.41 cups/day (n = 30) compared to a 0.25 cups/day decrease for 111 non-customers (p = 0.04). Intervention participants did not show significant improvements in perceived access to fresh F&V, but increased their self-efficacy for working more F&V into snacks (p = 0.02), making up a vegetable dish with what they had on hand (p = 0.03), and cooking vegetables in a way that is appealing to their family (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Mobile markets may help improve F&V intake in lower-income communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ID# NCT03026608 retrospectively registered January 2, 2017.Citation to related work
Springer Science and Business Media LLCHas part
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activityADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/4787