Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDuCette, Joseph P.
dc.contributor.advisorTincani, Matt
dc.creatorTarchichi, Ronnie
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-18T20:13:04Z
dc.date.available2021-01-18T20:13:04Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/4721
dc.description.abstractCurrent research has shown that writing to learn strategies have a positive impact on overall student learning. However, previous studies mainly assessed student learning through instruments that have been self-designed by researchers and there is little research examining relations between writing to learn strategies and science related context achievement such as biology measured through standardized testing. In addition, very few studies on writing to learn strategies with students with disabilities measure the potential relations with biology achievement. The purpose of this quantitative study is to address the literature gap by implementing the use of writing to learn strategies to institute growth and achievement in biological science in students with disabilities. The objective of the study is to evaluate content area growth of students with disabilities in biological science through the use of writing to learn strategies embedded in classroom pedagogy. Using experimental research, forty-eight students with high incidence disabilities in grades 9 and 10 received writing to learn strategies in their biology class during the school day. The quantitative instrumentation involved in the study is a pre-test comprehensive biology baseline exam, a mid-treatment biology assessment, and a post-test comprehensive biology exam, an acceptability survey, and an attitude toward biology survey that was administered over a semester’s timeline. The exams simulated standardized biology exams that employ the New Jersey Science Standards (NJSS) taught within the curriculum. All exams were slightly different; however, they focused on the same standards in biological science and the same overall content. Results were that the experimental group showed greater growth than the control group in the mid-treatment assessment, posttest and the Attitude Toward Biology Survey. Empirical implications are that writing to learn strategies would have significant impact on biological science standardized testing for students with disabilities.
dc.format.extent129 pages
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTemple University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartofTheses and Dissertations
dc.rightsIN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectEducation
dc.titleWRITING TO LEARN STRATEGIES ON STUDENT LEARNING IN BIOLOGY: AN EXPERIMENT WITH STUDENTS WITH SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITES
dc.typeText
dc.type.genreThesis/Dissertation
dc.contributor.committeememberDuCette, Joseph P.
dc.contributor.committeememberTincani, Matt
dc.contributor.committeememberThurman, S. Kenneth
dc.contributor.committeememberSawaya, Bassel E.
dc.description.departmentSpecial Education
dc.relation.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/4703
dc.ada.noteFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
dc.description.degreePh.D.
dc.identifier.proqst14255
dc.creator.orcid0000-0002-8029-7224
dc.date.updated2021-01-14T17:04:49Z
refterms.dateFOA2021-01-18T20:13:05Z
dc.identifier.filenameTarchichi_temple_0225E_14255.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Tarchichi_temple_0225E_14255.pdf
Size:
1.314Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record