Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPollack, Mark
dc.creatorEmmons, Cassandra
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T20:49:10Z
dc.date.available2020-10-05T20:49:10Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.other910912498
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/454
dc.descriptionThis research project was completed as part of the course, Political Science (4891).
dc.description.abstractPast the time of traditional coups, today’s would-be dictators are seeking out more ambiguous ways to undercut democracy. These norm violations are often difficult to identify, and sometimes are conceived of as less threatening to outsiders. So, what can an intergovernmental organization do if its member states begin to violate common democratic norms in an ambiguous way? While some have claimed IGO action is determined by the violating state’s power or the pressure of third parties, few have explored the influence of an IGO’s structure and design on its decision to enforce norms. This paper explores some ambiguous measures being taken to undermine democracy, and seeks to disaggregate the complex process of IGO norm enforcement and subject the moving parts to initial scrutiny. In this paper, I assess the impact of five IGO characteristics on its decision to enforce democratic norms in member states: IGO composition or democratic density, democratic norm legalization, enforcement provisions, voting rules in the IGO’s intergovernmental branches, and delegation to the IGO’s supranational bodies. I develop six, independent hypotheses, relating one IGO characteristic to one aspect of the decision-making process. Using a pattern matching research design, I conduct a comparative case-study analysis of the Peruvian autogolpe facing the Organization of American States in 1992 and the Hungarian constitutional crisis challenging the European Union today to test each variable’s predicted effect.
dc.format.extent90 pages
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTemple University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartofTemple Undergraduate Research Prize Winners
dc.rightsIN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.titleAmbiguous Attacks on Democracy in Europe and the Americas: What can intergovernmental organizations do?
dc.typeText
dc.type.genreResearch project
dc.contributor.groupTemple University. Honors Program
dc.description.departmentPolitical Science
dc.relation.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/436
dc.ada.noteFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
dc.description.awardThe Library Prize for Undergraduate Research
dc.description.schoolcollegeTemple University. College of Liberal Arts
refterms.dateFOA2020-10-05T20:49:10Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
p15037coll12_2201.pdf
Size:
554.8Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record