Condyle modeling stability, craniofacial asymmetry and ACTN3 genotypes: Contribution to TMD prevalence in a cohort of dentofacial deformities
Genre
Journal ArticleDate
2020-07-01Author
Nicot, RChung, K
Vieira, AR
Raoul, G
Ferri, J
Sciote, JJ
Subject
ActininAdult
Chin
Dental Models
Dentofacial Deformities
Face
Female
Genetic Association Studies
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Humans
Jaw
Male
Malocclusion
Mandibular Condyle
Orthognathic Surgical Procedures
Phosphoric Diester Hydrolases
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Pyrophosphatases
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/4472
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0236425Abstract
© This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. Craniofacial asymmetry, mandibular condylar modeling and temporomandibular joint disorders are common comorbidities of skeletally disproportionate malocclusions, but etiology of occurrence together is poorly understood. We compared asymmetry, condyle modeling stability and temporomandibular health in a cohort of 128 patients having orthodontics and orthognathic surgery to correct dentofacial deformity malocclusions. We also compared ACTN3 and ENPP1 genotypes for association to clinical conditions. Pre-surgical posterior-anterior cephalometric and panometric radiographic analyses; jaw pain and function questionnaire and clinical examination of TMD; and SNP-genotype analysis from saliva samples were compared to assess interrelationships. Almost half had asymmetries in need of surgical correction, which could be subdivided into four distinct morphological patterns. Asymmetric condyle modeling between sides was significantly greater in craniofacial asymmetry, but most commonly had an unanticipated pattern. Often, longer or larger condyles occurred on the shorter mandibular ramus side. Subjects with longer ramus but dimensionally smaller condyles were more likely to have self-reported TMD symptoms (p = 0.023) and significantly greater clinical diagnosis of TMD (p = 0.000001), with masticatory myalgia most prominent. Genotyping found two significant genotype associations for ACTN3 rs1671064 (Q523R missense) p = 0.02; rs678397 (intronic SNP) p = 0.04 and one significant allele association rs1815739 (R577X nonsense) p = 0.00. Skeletal asymmetry, unusual condyle modeling and TMD are common and interrelated components of many dentofacial deformities. Imbalanced musculoskeletal functional adaptations and genetic or epigenetic influences contribute to the etiology, and require further investigation.Citation to related work
Public Library of Science (PLoS)Has part
PLoS ONEADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/4454
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/