Show simple item record

dc.creatorYuen, Eva YN
dc.creatorThomson, Maria
dc.creatorGardiner, Heather
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-14T19:37:59Z
dc.date.available2020-12-14T19:37:59Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-01
dc.identifier.issn2474-8307
dc.identifier.issn2474-8307
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/4400
dc.identifier.otherPMC6607839 (pmc)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/4418
dc.description.abstractBackground: Nutrition literacy (NL) and food literacy (FL) have emerged as key components in the promotion and maintenance of healthy dietary practices. However, a critical appraisal of existing tools is required to advance the operationalization and measurement of these constructs using instruments that demonstrate sound validity and reliability. Methods: Electronic databases were searched in January and July 2016, January 2017, and March 2018 for publications detailing the development and/or testing of NL or FL instruments. Instruments' psychometric properties were assessed using a structured methodological framework. We identified 2,563 new titles and abstracts, and short-listed 524 for full review. The extent to which key domains of NL were included in each measure was examined. Key Results: Thirteen instruments assessing NL underwent full evaluation; seven from the United States, and one each from Australia, Norway, Switzerland, Italy, Hong Kong, and Japan. Measures targeted general Spanish-, Italian-, or Cantonese-speaking adults; primary care patients, parent, and populations with breast cancer. Instruments ranged from 6 to 64 items, and they predominantly assessed functional NL rather than broader domains of NL. Substantial variation in methodological rigor was observed across measures. Discussion: Multidimensional and psychometrically sound measures that capture broader domains of NL and assess FL are needed. Plain Language Summary: This review systemically compiles, and critically appraises 13 existing measures that assess nutrition literacy and food literacy in an adult population. Substantial variation in methodological rigor was found across the measures, and most tools assessed nutrition literacy rather than food literacy. Findings from this current review may be useful to guide development of future measures that comprehensively capture nutrition literacy and food literacy. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice . 2018;2(3):e134-e160.].
dc.format.extente134-e160
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.haspartHLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice
dc.relation.isreferencedbySLACK, Inc.
dc.rightsCC BY
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleMeasuring Nutrition and Food Literacy in Adults: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Existing Measurement Tools
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.genreJournal Article
dc.type.genreReview
dc.relation.doi10.3928/24748307-20180625-01
dc.ada.noteFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
dc.creator.orcidGardiner, Heather Marie|0000-0003-2017-991X
dc.date.updated2020-12-14T19:37:56Z
refterms.dateFOA2020-12-14T19:38:00Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Measuring Nutrition and Food ...
Size:
1.277Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY