Biological relevance of computationally predicted pathogenicity of noncoding variants
Genre
Journal ArticleDate
2019-12-01Author
Liu, LSanderford, MD
Patel, R
Chandrashekar, P
Gibson, G
Kumar, S
Subject
AlgorithmsAnimals
Computational Biology
Disease
Evolution, Molecular
Genome-Wide Association Study
Humans
Machine Learning
Mammals
Models, Statistical
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
RNA, Untranslated
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/4348
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
10.1038/s41467-018-08270-yAbstract
© 2019, The Author(s). Computational prediction of the phenotypic propensities of noncoding single nucleotide variants typically combines annotation of genomic, functional and evolutionary attributes into a single score. Here, we evaluate if the claimed excellent accuracies of these predictions translate into high rates of success in addressing questions important in biological research, such as fine mapping causal variants, distinguishing pathogenic allele(s) at a given position, and prioritizing variants for genetic risk assessment. A significant disconnect is found to exist between the statistical modelling and biological performance of predictive approaches. We discuss fundamental reasons underlying these deficiencies and suggest that future improvements of computational predictions need to address confounding of allelic, positional and regional effects as well as imbalance of the proportion of true positive variants in candidate lists.Citation to related work
Springer Science and Business Media LLCHas part
Nature CommunicationsADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/4330