A longitudinal study of post-traumatic growth and psychological distress in colorectal cancer survivors
Genre
Journal ArticleDate
2015-09-29Author
Occhipinti, SChambers, SK
Lepore, S
Aitken, J
Dunn, J
Subject
AdultAged
Aged, 80 and over
Colorectal Neoplasms
Emotional Adjustment
Female
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Quality of Life
Stress, Psychological
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/4208
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0139119Abstract
© 2015 Occhipinti et al. The stability of post-traumatic growth overtime and the relationship between post-traumatic growth and traditional distress outcomes remains unclear. We tracked post-traumatic growth in a population-based sample of colorectal cancer patients from soon after diagnosis to five years subsequently to assess the heterogeneity of a post-traumatic growth response to cancer over time and describe the simultaneous and longitudinal relationships between post-traumatic growth and psychological distress. 1966 colorectal patients who were five months post diagnosis were assessed six times over a five year period. There was considerable heterogeneity associated with both psychological distress and benefit finding scores over time. However, both for benefit finding and psychological distress, the variation in individual scores suggested an underlying positive linear trend and both lagged and lagged change components. Specifically, benefit finding and psychological distress are mutual leading indicators of each other. First, benefit finding served as a leading indicator of distress, in that increases in reported benefit finding from year to year predicted higher future increases in psychological distress. As well, in an inverse relationship, psychological distress served as a leading indicator of benefit finding, such that increases in reported distress from year to year predicted lower future increases in benefit finding. Post-traumatic growth may reflect patients coping efforts to enhance perceptions of wellbeing in response to escalating cancer-related threats, acting as harbinger of increasing trajectories of psychological distress. This explanation is consistent with a cognitive dissonance response in which threats to the integrity of the self then lead to a tendency to accentuate positive aspects of the self.Citation to related work
Public Library of Science (PLoS)Has part
PLoS ONEADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/4190