Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBeglar, David
dc.creatorThurman, John P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-05T16:09:45Z
dc.date.available2020-11-05T16:09:45Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.other864884411
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/3688
dc.description.abstractThis study was an examination of the effect that three levels of topic choice (no choice, limited choice, and complete choice) would have on students' Task Interest and Task Self-efficacy (Study 1, 78 participants), and on three aspects of students' oral output: Accuracy, Complexity, and Fluency (Study 2, 42 participants in 21 pairs). Also examined were the effects that three types of tasks (descriptive, narrative, and decision-making) exerted on these five variables. Data were collected using a questionnaire for Study 1 and recording the participants' conversations for Study 2. Data were collected in nine consecutive treatments to examine the main effects of choice and task, and the interaction effects of choice and task, using two-way repeated-measures ANOVAs. For Study 1, limited choice promoted Task Interest for the descriptive and narrative tasks, and Task Self-efficacy for the narrative and decision-making tasks to a statistically significant degree. In addition, the descriptive task had the highest Task Interest for the no choice and complete choice treatments and had the highest Task Self-efficacy for the no choice of topic treatment. The findings generally indicated that the participants were more interested in the task when there was choice, and that this led to higher levels of Task Interest and Task Self-efficacy. The Study 2 results indicated that Complexity was significantly higher when choice was introduced for the descriptive and narrative tasks. Accuracy and Fluency were not influenced to a statistically significant degree by choice, but they were positively influenced nonetheless. Attentional resources may have been freed up when choice was introduced and the participants may have been more willing to take risks, both possibly causing the significantly higher levels of complexity for choice. Suggestions for further research include a closer examination of the process students use when choosing a topic and examining ways for a more efficient method of introducing choice into the task-based language teaching syllabus.
dc.format.extent350 pages
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTemple University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartofTheses and Dissertations
dc.rightsIN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectEducation, Language and Literature
dc.subjectLanguage Learning
dc.subjectChoice
dc.subjectAutonomy
dc.subjectTask-based
dc.subjectOutput
dc.titleTHE INTERACTION OF TOPIC CHOICE AND TASK-TYPE IN THE EFL CLASSROOM
dc.typeText
dc.type.genreThesis/Dissertation
dc.contributor.committeememberSchaefer, Kenneth G.
dc.contributor.committeememberNorris, John M., 1967-
dc.contributor.committeememberTatsuki, Donna Hurst
dc.contributor.committeememberSawyer, Mark
dc.description.departmentCITE/Language Arts
dc.relation.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/3670
dc.ada.noteFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
dc.description.degreePh.D.
refterms.dateFOA2020-11-05T16:09:45Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
umi-temple-1056.pdf
Size:
10.64Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record