Organizational Resilience in a Quasi-Total Institution: The U.S. Army Engages the Millennial Generation
Committee memberDi Benedetto, C. Anthony
Andersson, Lynne Mary
Wray, Matt, 1964-
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/3024
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThis research examines the United States Army’s adaptation and organizational resilience as it faces the phenomenon of what is commonly assumed to be the drastically different millennial generation of potential recruits, soldiers, and future leaders. Millennials are arguably the most unique generation to date when compared to their predecessors, mainly due to the significant technological advances of the past few decades and their ubiquitous use of technology. This study is distinctive because it addresses organizational resilience and generational gap issues from a cultural maintenance versus an adaptation and resilience viewpoint within what the author argues is presently a quasi-total, rather than total, institution. The study results refute important claims in the existing literature, which label the U.S. Army a total institution. That designation is no longer accurate because the modern U.S. Army has changed drastically. The ‘total institution’ label for the modern U.S. Army is only true during certain periods of the soldier’s experience, such as during onboarding or deployment. Thus, the label quasi-total is a better descriptor of the modern U.S. Army. Still, the U.S. Army’s need to change, so that it can recruit, train, accommodate, and retain this younger generation as an employer, must be balanced with preserving the organizational ability, culture and identity essential for the U.S. Army to function. That constant need for balance between accommodation and maintenance of core values and processes has mitigated the ‘total institution’ mindset of old. That is a major finding of this study. This study is an exploratory investigation using formal theme statements in an interview format given to the top 1% of the 1% of the U.S. Army’s leadership, as well as to lower ranking millennial soldiers. In this it is rare, if not unique. It is a problem-solving exploratory effort. In addition to a review of existing literature on related interdisciplinary topics, the study collected and analyzed empirical data in the forms of semi-structured interviews of senior grade non-millennial officers in Part 2, and, in Part 3, interviews of junior grade millennial generation soldiers who are currently serving. The study took a holistic approach to understand relevant views of different generations presently in the service and harvested the experiences and perspectives of senior leaders who have witnessed the U.S. Army’s transition firsthand. The findings indicate that several junior millennial respondents had contrary views and values to the assumptions society makes about them. Nor did they identify with the stereotypes of common views and biases about their generation. Amid signifying that not all millennials are alike, this discovery more importantly implies that assimilation to a strong organizational culture can transcend and/or alter presumed generational characteristics and norms, thereby demonstrating the U.S. Army’s resilience at the organizational level. The study showcases the uniqueness of the U.S. Army: as a ‘quasi-total institution’ it differs from others so labeled because it becomes much less total as the member spends more time in it. As an organization, the U.S. Army is different from most others because it must retain its talent since it has to grow leadership internally. Finally, its strong culture is essential to daily operations. Despite those facts that make the subject organization unique, parts of the study are relevant to many businesses globally which face similar issues of organizational adaptation versus resilience enfolding their multi-generational millennial versus non-millennial workforce.
ADA complianceFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact email@example.com
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Student Voice in School Reform: A Case Study of Madison High School's Youth-Adult Governance ModelGross, Steven Jay; Jordan, Will J.; Shapiro, Joan Poliner; Woyshner, Christine A.; Partlow, Michelle Chaplin, 1941-; Mitra, Dana L. (Temple University. Libraries, 2014)This qualitative case study examined how Madison High School's governance model generated youth-adult collaborations around school problems. This seven-month intensive study collected data through numerous site observations, semi-structured one-on-one interviews with 27 adults and students, focus group interview with 11 students, and document collection. This data collection answered the following research questions: To what extent does Madison High School include students and faculty into the policy decision-making, implementation, and review process? If so, how? Why is it done this way? How do faculty, students, administration, and staff perceive its impact on improving the school policy creation and implementation process? Student voice scholars are still investigating the ways in which student leadership around school reform can be facilitated (Dempster & Lizzio, 2007; Fielding, 2004; Mitra, 2005; Mitra & Gross, 2009; O'Donoghue, Kirshner & McLaughlin, 2002; Zeldin, McDaniel, Topitzes, & Calvert, 2000; Zeldin, 2004a). And scholars are interested in investigating how participants enact leadership when it is distributed to them (Hallinger & Heck, 1996; Spillane, 2001, 2004). This study found that not only does the school's governance model include students in the policy making, implementation, and review processes, it distributed leadership across the school and aided in organizational learning by designing its structures and processes around constitutional principles.
Emotional-Social Intelligence, Leadership, and Gender in Contemporary New Jersey School DistrictsShapiro, Joan Poliner; DuCette, Joseph P.; Gross, Steven Jay; Sanford-DeShields, Jayminn (Temple University. Libraries, 2017)The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the self-perceived emotional-social intelligence and the self-perceived leadership characteristics of New Jersey educational administrators in relation to issues potentially complicated by gender. Both emotional-social intelligence and leadership were categorized into more specific aspects for comparison purposes. I administered a version of the Bar-On EQ-i test (EQ-i 2.0 online version) for emotional intelligence to school administrators in educational leadership positions in various New Jersey school districts. Additionally, the educational administrators completed the online version of the Leadership Practices Inventory assessment by Kouzes and Posner measuring “The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership.” A minimum sample of twenty-five participants was sought from across all district types in New Jersey via emailed invitations to over five hundred individuals. More than twenty-five administrators ultimately agreed to participate; however, out of the forty-two administrators who did so and completed the consent agreement, two elected to formally withdraw their participation after the research was in process. Any completed responses from these two individuals were withdrawn from final analyses. From the remaining forty participants, two female administrators did not complete the EQ-i 2.0 assessment, and one male and three females did not complete the LPI assessment. Although the proposal for this research initially included a potential open-ended semi-structured interview designed by the researcher in which specific points would be analyzed if the need for such emerged from the quantitative data collection process, this phase ultimately did not occur; however, it is my recommendation that a fully independent but related qualitative project be undertaken in the future. Several research questions were posed and studied. It was assumed that there are no significant differences between male and female school leaders’ responses on the two instruments. An analysis of variance was used to determine the relationship between emotional-social intelligence and administrators’ self-perceived leadership abilities when analyzing response variables and explanatory variables of each gender group. Resultant data were analyzed and reported to include measures of validity and reliability. This work may provide a framework to better understand the emotional-social acuity, leadership skills, and experiential history of male and female New Jersey educational leaders in relation to self-perceptions of emotional-social intelligence and leadership characteristics. The research results have the potential to provide preliminary suggestions for additional research in the area of leadership development in schools and in graduate preparation programs.
An Evaluation of the Use of Feedback as an Antecedent on Securing a Wheelchair in a VanFisher, Amanda Guld; Axelrod, Saul; Hineline, Philip Neil; Tincani, Matt; Hantula, Donald A.; Dowdy, Arthur (Temple University. Libraries, 2019)Performance feedback has long been a popular strategy for organizational change (Fairbank & Prue, 1981). One of the primary advantages of performance feedback interventions is the relatively low cost of implementation for organizations when compared to other productivity-enhancement techniques, such as monetary incentives (Yukl, Wexley, & Seymore, 1972) like pay for performance (Lazear, 1995) or employee of the month programs with rewards associated with them (Daniels, 2000). Performance feedback is beneficial to ensure that employees are knowledgeable of the expectations, and what aspects of job performance need to be improved. Three studies (i.e., Betchel, McGee, Huitema, & Dickinson (2015); Alajadeff Abergel, Peterson, Wiskirchen, Hagen & Cole (2017) and Wine et. al. (2019)) have published research evaluating feedback presented prior to completion of a task; however, results varied. The current study evaluated whether feedback presented prior to a performance event improves performance when compared to a baseline condition where no feedback was presented.