Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBass, Sarah Bauerle
dc.creatorGreener, Judith Robin
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-04T15:19:53Z
dc.date.available2020-11-04T15:19:53Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.other958157229
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/2951
dc.description.abstractThe rate at which women choose mastectomy has grown dramatically, and of particular note is the increase in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). For women with no history of breast cancer or genetic risk, CPM represents a treatment decision that does not offer better long-term outcomes than the decision not to remove a healthy breast and may be associated with increased surgical risk and interventions, increased cost to the healthcare system, and potential adverse psycho-social outcomes. To better understand the decision making process regarding the election of CPM among women with early stage unilateral breast cancer, with no family history or genetic risk, a three-phase exploratory study was conducted. Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with healthcare providers who have close interaction with women during the decision making process (N=3) and patients who made a surgical decision about breast cancer treatment within the past three years (N=11). These two phases informed the design of the quantitative internet survey, conducted among women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer in the process of making a surgical decision (N=336). The survey design was also guided by an existing model for treatment decision making which uses a social ecological framework (Revenson & Pranikoff, 2005). In addition to descriptive analyses, perceptual mapping was utilized to understand patients’ conceptualizations of the relative importance of factors considered during the decision making process, and AdSAM® was used to gauge emotional response. Results suggest that women more likely to elect CPM demonstrate an emotional response to a generalized fear of cancer, along with the need to take control of their situation. In addition, retrospective interviews emphasized somewhat different reasons for electing CPM, highlighting the importance of prospective research in studying the decision making process.
dc.format.extent276 pages
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTemple University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartofTheses and Dissertations
dc.rightsIN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectBehavioral Sciences
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectBreast Cancer
dc.subjectContralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
dc.subjectDecision Making
dc.subjectPerceptual Mapping
dc.titleContralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: An Exploratory Approach to Understanding the Decision Making Process
dc.typeText
dc.type.genreThesis/Dissertation
dc.contributor.committeememberLepore, Stephen J.
dc.contributor.committeememberDavey, Adam
dc.contributor.committeememberDaly, Mary B.
dc.description.departmentPublic Health
dc.relation.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/2933
dc.ada.noteFor Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
dc.description.degreePh.D.
refterms.dateFOA2020-11-04T15:19:53Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
TETDEDXGreener_temple_0225E_12 ...
Size:
3.229Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record