• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of TUScholarShareCommunitiesDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenresThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenres

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutPeoplePoliciesHelp for DepositorsData DepositFAQs

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Hidden In Plain Sight: Disparate-Impact Discrimination as a Legal-Theoretical Paradigm for Difference-Conscious Public Policy

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    TETDEDXDeLise-temple-0225E-116 ...
    Size:
    963.8Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Genre
    Thesis/Dissertation
    Date
    2014
    Author
    DeLise, James Michael
    Advisor
    Schwartz, Joseph M., 1954-
    Committee member
    Gordon, Jane Anna, 1976-
    Davis, Heath Fogg
    Smith, Rogers M., 1953-
    Department
    Political Science
    Subject
    Political Science
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/2767
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/2749
    Abstract
    In this dissertation, I argue that the liberal multicultural paradigm of difference accommodation would have greater potency, tenability and relevance if scholars contextualized their claims and approach as intrinsic to U.S. political history and philosophy, as opposed to portraying it as extrinsic and antithetical to these political-philosophic traditions. Reframing liberal multiculturalism in this fashion allows for the acknowledgment of an extant legal-theoretical framework--disparate-impact discrimination--that addresses some of the demands of racial justice and aligns with the liberal multicultural commitment to cultural recognition. This is a significant contribution to the liberal multicultural paradigm of difference accommodation, as existing liberal multicultural theory does not incorporate demands for racial justice. Moreover, recasting liberal multiculturalism in this fashion contributes to the endeavors of difference theorists in general and liberal multiculturalists in particular by showing that, within the United States, difference-sensitive policies have been desirable, necessary and efficacious. A failure to reframe liberal multiculturalism in this way, however, reinforces the view that difference-conscious policies are foreign to the United States--a view consistent with the individualized reading of equal protection that has become ascendant on the U.S. Supreme Court. This reading of equal protection expresses hostility toward any race-conscious policies and has brought once inviolable, moderate race-conscious policies under attack. The current trajectory of race-conscious policies in the U.S., and the disavowal of the history on which such race-conscious policies are based, creates some urgency for remedying this oversight.
    ADA compliance
    For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
    Collections
    Theses and Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Temple University Libraries | 1900 N. 13th Street | Philadelphia, PA 19122
    (215) 204-8212 | scholarshare@temple.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.