• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of TUScholarShareCommunitiesDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenresThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenres

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutPeoplePoliciesHelp for DepositorsData DepositFAQs

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    EDUCATIONAL DECISION-MAKERS: INVESTIGATING THEIR ROLE-IDENTITY AND ACTION

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    TETDEDXBrock-temple-0225E-13961.pdf
    Size:
    929.8Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Genre
    Thesis/Dissertation
    Date
    2020
    Author
    Brock, Benjamin
    Advisor
    Kaplan, Avi
    Committee member
    Anderson, Gregory (Gregory Mark)
    DuCette, Joseph P.
    Nichols, Sharon Lynn
    Department
    Educational Psychology
    Subject
    Educational Leadership
    Educational Administration
    Education Policy
    Complexity
    Decision Making
    Role-identity
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/2631
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/2613
    Abstract
    Educational decision-makers influence the opportunities, experiences, and outcomes for all invested in public education. Given the increasingly complex social, cultural, political, and economic landscape within the United States in the 21st century, it seems more important than ever to better understand and appreciate who educational decision-makers are and the process by which these public education stewards make decisions. But while scholarship pertaining to educational decision-making is vast, only scarce research focuses explicitly on the decision-makers themselves. Specifically, extant research tends to overlook the way educational decision-makers understand their role and how they engage in educational decision-making. Therefore, this study set out to inquire into educational decision-makers’ meaning-making of themselves, their role, and the process by which they make educational decisions. This study’s guiding question was: how do educational decision-makers’ role-identity(ies) manifest and frame their educational decision-making? The study followed a phenomenological approach to investigate educational decision-makers perceptions and actions: the content, meaning-making, and process by which the participants construct their educational decision-maker identity and understand their decision-making process. The guiding theoretical frame for this study is the Dynamic Systems Model of Role Identity (DSMRI; Kaplan & Garner, 2017). The DSMRI conceptualizes decision-making to emerge from people’s contextualized and dynamic role interpretation—their role identity. According to the DSMRI, four interdependent multi-elemental components comprise role-identities: ontological and epistemological beliefs, purpose and goals, self-perceptions and self-definitions, and perceived action-possibilities. These components emerge within social-cultural contexts and function in a non-linear, non-deterministic, emergent manner to guide decision-making. The study investigated the content, structure, and process of formation of educational decision-makers’ role identities and how these elements frame the meaning of impactful decisions they made in their role. Seven educational decision-makers (5 women, 2 men) participated in this study. Each held either a state or a municipal educational decision-making position, with all positions located in the same educational context. Each participant partook in three life-story phenomenological interviews. The interviews followed Seidman’s (2013) protocol focusing on their past to the present (interview 1), their decision-making role (interview 2), and their insights from the previous two interviews (interview 3). Interviews were transcribed and analyzed with Kaplan and Garner’s (2016) DSMRI Codebook and Analysis Guide. The findings highlighted the complex and dynamic constellation of role-identities and role-identity elements that framed each educational decision-maker understanding of him- or herself and their decision-making. The findings depicted the participating educational decision-makers as unique individuals; highlighting their varied lived-experiences, socioeconomic backgrounds, educational degrees, professional expertise, and interpretations of their present self. Yet, the findings also highlighted the very similar process and content the participants engaged in for constructing their educational decision-maker role-identity. Specifically, despite their differences, all the decision-makers construed their current role-identity as grounded in perceived stable value-based personal aspects from their past role identities. In addition, all used similar cultural materials, meanings, and strategies to form their decision-making identity. This manifested most clearly in the shared underlying theme of their varied and dynamic role-identities as educational decision-makers who are “advocates.” The findings across these educational decision-makers paint a collective educational decision-making landscape within which the different decision-makers shared cultural themes and means for interpreting past personal events as forming their identity and decision-making. These insights may provide researchers, public education advocates, and even students and their families better insights into the way educational decision-makers approach their role and tasks. It may further guide stakeholders in strategies to engage these educational decision-makers by considering the fit of their agenda within the life-story educational decision-makers construe as foundational to their role identities and decision-making. The findings may also provide educational decision-makers a framework for reflection on their role and actions, and for further developing their identity and decision-making. Fundamentally, this research contributes to the efforts to improve educational experiences and opportunities for students attending public schools.
    ADA compliance
    For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
    Collections
    Theses and Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Temple University Libraries | 1900 N. 13th Street | Philadelphia, PA 19122
    (215) 204-8212 | scholarshare@temple.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.