• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of TUScholarShareCommunitiesDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenresThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenres

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutPeoplePoliciesHelp for DepositorsData DepositFAQs

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Single and Combined Effects of Cannabinoids on Neuropathic Pain and Cognition

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Myers_temple_0225M_12553.pdf
    Size:
    496.4Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Genre
    Thesis/Dissertation
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Myers, Alyssa Michelle
    Advisor
    Ward, Sara Jane
    Committee member
    Tuma, Ronald F. (Ronald Franklin)
    Langford, Dianne
    Kirby, Lynn
    Department
    Biomedical Sciences
    Subject
    Neurosciences
    Cannabinoids
    Cognition
    Neuropathic Pain
    Pain
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/1989
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/1971
    Abstract
    Rationale. For centuries, medications derived from the marijuana plant have been used for therapeutic purposes across numerous cultures. In 1964, the primary psychoactive ingredient in cannabis, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (-9-THC) was defined. This, followed by the discovery of the endocannabinoid system, marked the beginning of comprehensive research into the beneficial exploitation of this system. The cannabis plant contains various other cannabinoids besides -9-THC. Most of the effects of cannabinoid-based therapies are based on the agonistic action of -9-THC through cannabinoid receptors. Alternatively, some of these effects are caused by the actions of other cannabinoids, like cannabidiol, which does not have high affinity for cannabinoid receptors. Like -9-THC, cannabidiol (CBD), the non-psychoactive phytocannabinoid in Cannabis sativa, has been hypothesized to ameliorate adverse effects of -9-THC. Cannabidiol possesses neuroprotective, antiemetic, and anti-inflammatory properties. Sativex, a 1:1 ratio of CBD and -9-THC, is currently an approved medication in Europe for the treatment of conditions such as neuropathic pain, and has been fast tracked by the USFDA for late stage clinical trials for a host of disorders, ranging from epilepsy to irritable bowel disease. Additionally, increasing preclinical evidence demonstrates that treatment with Cannabidiol alone produces efficacy on a variety of nervous system injuries, including neuropathic pain, schizophrenia and anxiety disorders. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence of an “entourage effect” in cannabinoid-based pharmacotherapies. This effect occurs when treatment with a combination of cannabinoids derived from the plant produce more efficacy than treatment with a single cannabinoid (1). As cannabinoid-based treatments continue to develop and clinical data increases, further investigation of the entourage effect is necessary to facilitate the appropriate future treatment regimens for nervous system disorders. Hypotheses. We hypothesized that treatment with the non-psychoactive cannabis compound cannabidiol would be as effective as the psychoactive cannabis compound -9-THC, or a combination of the two, in mitigating neuropathic pain in a mouse model of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. We additionally hypothesized that cannabidiol would not affect classic cannabinoid-agonist induced cognitive impairment in rodent models of learning and memory. Methodology. Neuropathic pain was induced by repeated injections of the chemotherapeutic agent Paclitaxel. Mechanical hypersensitivity to Paclitaxel was assessed using the Von Frey assay. Cognition was assessed using three rodent models of learning and memory: 1) Conditional Discrimination, 2) Conditional Discrimination with a reversal component, and 3) Barnes Maze. Results. Cannabidiol was found to be more potent and more effective than -9-THC in attenuating neuropathic pain in a dose dependent manner. Combinations of CBD+-9-THC revealed that lower, ineffective doses of CBD and -9-THC display supra-additive effects when given in combination while higher, individually effective doses exhibit sub-additive effects in combination. Cognitively, no deficits were observed over a range of doses of any cannabinoid tested in the conditional discrimination tasks, although a slight trend was observed in animals administered the synthetic mixed CB1/CB2 agonist WIN55,212-2. In the Barnes Maze task, treatment with -9-THC alone dose-dependently decreased number of entries and total time spent in the target zone. Cannabidiol did not produce any effects in the Barnes Maze alone, nor did it attenuate the effects seen in animals treated with -9-THC alone. Lastly, -9-THC did not affect total distance traveled or average speed, whereas combination treatment increased both locomotor measurements at all but the highest combination dose. Conclusions. The results of these studies indicate that cannabidiol is more potent than -9-THC in attenuating neuropathic pain. Results of cognitive testing indicate subtle impairment in animals treated with -9-THC and WIN55,212-2 that were not reversed by CBD.
    ADA compliance
    For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
    Collections
    Theses and Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Temple University Libraries | 1900 N. 13th Street | Philadelphia, PA 19122
    (215) 204-8212 | scholarshare@temple.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.