• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of TUScholarShareCommunitiesDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenresThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsGenres

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutPeoplePoliciesHelp for DepositorsData DepositFAQs

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A Strange Distinction: Religion and Civic Life since Martin Luther King Jr.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    McAdams_temple_0225E_10421.pdf
    Size:
    656.8Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Genre
    Thesis/Dissertation
    Date
    2010
    Author
    McAdams, Charles Brian
    Advisor
    Raines, John C.
    Committee member
    Alpert, Rebecca T. (Rebecca Trachtenberg), 1950-
    Botwinick, Aryeh
    Pahl, Jon, 1958-
    Department
    Religion
    Subject
    Religion, General
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/1862
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/1844
    Abstract
    Martin Luther King Jr. is an American civil saint whose life and work blended religion into his civic engagement. Yet prominent political theorists and religious ethicists writing since the Civil Rights Movement fail to make a place for King's type of activism. Drawing heavily upon King's "Letter from Birmingham City Jail," this dissertation problematizes the work of several religious and political thinkers by contrasting their theoretical work with King's life and work. John Rawls is the most influential post-Civil Rights Movement liberal and his theoretical work draws a stark line between religion and politics. Rawls assumes that this division is necessary for the preservation of democracy and he demands that religious people re-frame their political ideas using nonreligious language. This dissertation shows that Rawls's work would effectively exclude King even though King's movement resulted in a massive expansion of democracy. It turns next to Stephen L. Carter's criticism of such exclusion of religious in the name of democracy and Richard Rorty defense of it. It is hard to overestimate the influence of Stanley Hauerwas on American religious ethics in the era since Martin Luther King. This dissertation also shows that Hauerwas presumes that Rawls is right, that democracy requires religious language be translated in to nonreligious language. Hauerwas is simply unwilling to sacrifice fidelity for the sake of democracy. Christians, he suggests, should opt out of civic life rather than translate their ideas. Finally, this dissertation shows that Jeffrey Stout's pragmatism as outlined in his book Democracy and Tradition is a vast improvement over Rawls, Rorty and Hauerwas. Stout engages each of those thinkers while remembering the witness of Martin Luther King Jr. Despite his significant improvement, Stout still maintains, though in a weakened form, a distinction between sacred life and secular life. King, in "Letter from Birmingham City Jail," called this "a strange distinction." This dissertation argues for further opening up democratic discourse to a wider variety of religious voices.
    ADA compliance
    For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
    Collections
    Theses and Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Temple University Libraries | 1900 N. 13th Street | Philadelphia, PA 19122
    (215) 204-8212 | scholarshare@temple.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.