Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education
Genre
Journal articleDate
2019-04-01Department
Temple University (Health Sciences Center Campus). LibrarySubject
Exam preparationStudy habits
Self-directed learning
Proprietary study resources
Study tools
Visual learning
Medical libraries
Medical students
Licensure examinations
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/178
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
https://dx.doi.org/10.5195%2Fjmla.2019.619Abstract
Traditionally, health sciences libraries have supported patrons who are preparing for medical licensure examinations by collecting and making accessible board exam preparation resources, such as question banks and study guides. However, when online board exam preparation resources are not available for licensing, providing equitable access to all library users can be a challenge. In recent years, a new generation of online study resources has emerged. Sites such as SketchyMedical and Picmonic use visual learning mnemonics, while resources such as Quizlet leverage crowd-sourcing to generate study content. While some of the content from these resources is made freely available, these resources are often limited to paid individual subscribers. This new generation of study resources, thus, presents a conundrum for health sciences librarians. On the one hand, these innovative resources offer new insights into how students learn and study, reflecting pedagogical trends in self-directed learning. On the other hand, the proprietary individual subscription–based model of these resources can widen the achievement gap between students who can afford to pay subscription costs and those who cannot. This commentary provides an overview of some of the most popular medical board examination preparation resources that have emerged in recent years. The authors suggest that health sciences librarians collaborate with medical students and educators to better understand and evaluate these resources.Citation
O'Hanlon R, Laynor G. Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019;107(2):251–257. doi:10.5195/jmla.2019.619Citation to related work
University Library System, University of PittsburghHas part
Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 107, No. 2ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/165