Flat Tax Revolution?: Policy Change and Policy Diffusion in Eastern Europe
dc.contributor.advisor | Deeg, Richard, 1961- | |
dc.creator | Ellis, Joseph Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-26T18:25:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-26T18:25:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.other | 864884701 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/1163 | |
dc.description.abstract | Why have Eastern European states adopted flat tax policies? That is what this dissertation answers. This is a curious development given that flat tax policies were noticeably absent from the landscape of most of the world, including Eastern Europe. Fives cases of adoption are examined, including Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. I argue that two simultaneous processes occur in Eastern Europe that makes adoption viable. First, at the domestic level, the idea of the flat tax is held in esteem by a number of actors, specifically: elite carriers, tax and financial ministers, think tanks and right-wing political parties. They champion this idea to its adoption, or at the least, introduce the flat tax into the policy-making apparatus. Second, at the international level, policy diffusion of the flat tax is taking place. In other words, the experience of previous adopters impacts the decisions of future adopters. Examining both cognitive heuristics theory and rational learning I argue that there are "varieties of diffusion" during the diffusion of the flat tax. Additionally, though this dissertation concerns itself primarily with adoption, I also investigate two cases of non-adoption in Poland and Hungary. What is argued is "diffusion without adoption" occurs. The idea of the flat tax diffused, but the adoption was not politically, ideologically, and economically feasible. | |
dc.format.extent | 201 pages | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Temple University. Libraries | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Theses and Dissertations | |
dc.rights | IN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available. | |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | Political Science, General | |
dc.subject | Flat Tax | |
dc.subject | Ideas | |
dc.subject | Mart Laar | |
dc.subject | Policy Adoption | |
dc.subject | Policy Diffusion | |
dc.subject | Public Policy | |
dc.title | Flat Tax Revolution?: Policy Change and Policy Diffusion in Eastern Europe | |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.type.genre | Thesis/Dissertation | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Fioretos, Karl Orfeo, 1966- | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Suárez, Sandra L. | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Orenstein, Mitchell A. (Mitchell Alexander) | |
dc.description.department | Political Science | |
dc.relation.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/1145 | |
dc.ada.note | For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu | |
dc.description.degree | Ph.D. | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2020-10-26T18:25:43Z |