Search Methods for The Goldilocks Procedure: Comparing Complication Rates in High Risk Populations: a systematic review
Genre
DatasetDate
2024-01-14Department
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Surgical OncologyKrausz Library of Podiatric Medicine
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/10902
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/10864http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/10864
Abstract
The databases included in this search are [list of databases: PubMed (NLM), Embase (Elsevier),Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate), Science Direct (Elsevier), and CINAHL (Ebscohost) using a combination of keywords and subject headings. A grey literature search included TRIP medical database(tripdatabase.com). All final searches were performed on January 9, 2025 by the librarian and were fully reported on January 9, 2025. The full search strategies as reported by the librarian are provided in Appendix(___). They are also archived at [DOI]. A summary of the search results: PubMed (NLM) from 1809 to 01/09/2025 (28 Results) Embase (Elsevier) from 1974 to 01/09/2025 (33 Results) Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate Analytics) from 1900 to 01/09/2025 (30 Results) Science Direct (Elsevier) from inception to 01/09/2025 (18) CINAHL (EbscoHost) from 1976 to 01/09/2025 (1 Result) TRIP Pro from 1867 to 01/09/2025 (14 results) The search resulted in 124 results. 66 duplicate studies were found and omitted by the librarian [SB] using EndNote 20 and following the following the Wichor method. This resulted in 58 records to screen from databases and websites. Studies were screened by title and abstract by two blinded and independent reviewers. If a tiebreaker was needed, a third reviewer was called in. This process was repeated for full text article screening and article selection.Description
To identify studies to include or consider for this systematic review, the review team worked with a librarian (SB) to develop detailed search strategies for each database. The PRISMA-S extension was followed for search reporting. The librarian (SB) developed the search for PubMed and translated the search for every database searched. The PubMed search strategy was reviewed by the research team to check for accuracy and term relevancy. All final searches were peer-reviewed by another librarian (Becca Fülöp, PhD, MLIS) following the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS checklist). The search included no major limits or date restrictions.Citation
Bauman, S., Chang, A., Patel, S., et al. Search Methods for The Goldilocks Procedure: Comparing Complication Rates in High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Review. January 9, 2025. Temple University Libraries, Evidence Synthesis and Systematic Review Service.ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.eduCollections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA