Thumbnail Image
Item

Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review

Wieringa, Thomas H.
; 
Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene
; 
Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela
; 
de Wit, Maartje
; 
Ponce, Oscar J.
; 
Sanchez-Herrera, Manuela F.
; 
Espinoza, Nataly R.
; ; 
Kunneman, Marleen
; 
Schoonmade, Linda J.
... show 2 more
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Journal article
Date
2019-05-20
Advisor
Committee member
Group
Department
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Subject
Chronic illnesses
 Decision aids
 Shared decision making
Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12613/4327
Collections
Faculty/Researcher Works
Show all metadata
Files
Thumbnail Image
Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses a systematic review.pdf
Adobe PDF, 876.42 KB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1034-4
Abstract
Background: Shared decision making (SDM) is a patient-centered approach in which clinicians and patients work together to find and choose the best course of action for each patient’s particular situation. Six SDM key elements can be identified: situation diagnosis, choice awareness, option clarification, discussion of harms and benefits, deliberation of patient preferences, and making the decision. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) require that a decision aid (DA) support these key elements. Yet, the extent to which DAs support these six key SDM elements and how this relates to their impact remain unknown. Methods: We searched bibliographic databases (from inception until November 2017), reference lists of included studies, trial registries, and experts for randomized controlled trials of DAs in patients with cardiovascular, or chronic respiratory conditions or diabetes. Reviewers worked in duplicate and independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted trial, and DA characteristics, and evaluated the quality of each trial. Results: DAs most commonly clarified options (20 of 20; 100%) and discussed their harms and benefits (18 of 20; 90%; unclear in two DAs); all six elements were clearly supported in 4 DAs (20%). We found no association between the presence of these elements and SDM outcomes. Conclusions: DAs for selected chronic conditions are mostly designed to transfer information about options and their harms and benefits. The extent to which their support of SDM key elements relates to their impact on SDM outcomes could not be ascertained.
Description
Citation
Wieringa, T. H., Rodriguez-Gutierrez, R., Spencer-Bonilla, G., et al. (2019). Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 8(121). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1034-4
Citation to related work
BMC
Has part
Systematic Reviews, Vol. 8
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu
Embedded videos