Loading...
Why (and How to) Define Securitization? A Sur-Reply to Professor Schwarcz
Lipson, Jonathan C.
Lipson, Jonathan C.
Citations
Altmetric:
Genre
Journal article
Date
2012-07
Advisor
Committee member
Group
Department
Permanent link to this record
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/6772
Abstract
In his brief essay, What Is Securitization? And for What Purpose? (“Purpose”), Professor Steven Schwarcz does me a great honor in responding to my article, Re: Defining Securitization (“Re: Defining”), where I ask what, exactly, does the term “securitization” mean? As serious observers of, and participants in, securitization know, Professor Schwarcz is one of the leading authorities on the subject. His works–for both professional and academic audiences–are must-reads. Thus, if, as I say in Re: Defining, my goal was to be not the last word on this question but the first, the fact that he has written such a thoughtful response tells me I have succeeded. Nevertheless, several of his criticisms warrant scrutiny. Unaddressed, they may leave readers misunderstanding the purpose of the definitional exercise I undertake in Re: Defining. Thus, I offer this brief “sur-reply” to Professor Schwarcz, which has four primary parts.
Description
Citation
Jonathan C. Lipson, Why (and How to) Define Securitization? A Sur-Reply to Professor Schwarcz, 85 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1301 (2012).
Available at: https://southerncalifornialawreview.com/2012/07/09/why-and-how-to-define-securitization-a-sur-reply-to-professor-schwarcz-article-by-jonathan-c-lipson/
Available at: https://southerncalifornialawreview.com/2012/07/09/why-and-how-to-define-securitization-a-sur-reply-to-professor-schwarcz-article-by-jonathan-c-lipson/
Citation to related work
Southern California Law Review
Has part
Southern California Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 5
ADA compliance
For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact scholarshare@temple.edu